WeVote

Bill

Bill

HR 666

MEMORIAL-MABEL ORANGE

104th Regular Session Introduced by Sonya Harper

The bill designates a memorial named “MEMORIAL-MABEL ORANGE” on public property, with management and maintenance responsibilities to accompany the designation.

Resolution Adopted
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 666

Summary of Bill: HR 666 (104th Session) – MEMORIAL-MABEL ORANGE (Illinois)

Purpose and intent

  • The bill designates a memorial in honor of Mabel Orange. The naming serves to recognize and commemorate the contributions or significance of Mabel Orange within the jurisdiction.
  • Illogical or unclear language in the title suggests a memorialization purpose, likely as a state or local tribute.

Key provisions and changes

  • Establishment of a memorial designated as “MEMORIAL-MABEL ORANGE.”
  • Allocation or authorization related to funding, placement, and maintenance of the memorial (details such as funding sources, whether from state appropriations, local funds, or public-private partnerships, would be specified in the bill text).
  • Administrative responsibilities for the memorial, including designation of a managing entity (e.g., a state department, park district, or a commission) and requirements for oversight, upkeep, and public accessibility.
  • Potential criteria for eligibility or prioritization if the memorial includes educational components, plaques, or interpretive signage.

Who or what would be affected

  • Public lands or facilities where the memorial would be sited, including parks, public plazas, or state/local government properties.
  • Government agencies or municipal bodies charged with approving, funding, or maintaining the memorial.
  • The general public, as beneficiaries of a new memorial space and any associated educational or commemorative programming.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • The bill would move through the usual legislative process for memorial designations, including committee review, potential amendments, and eventual approval.
  • If enacted, there would typically be a defined implementation timeline outlining steps from authorization to completion, including site selection, design, fundraising (if applicable), and dedication ceremonies.
  • Any reporting requirements or sunset provisions, if included, would specify periodic updates to legislators or governing bodies.

Notes

  • The bill’s short title indicates a memorialization without broad regulatory changes, suggesting a ceremonial designation with ancillary administrative duties.
  • Specifics such as the exact site, funding amounts, duration of memorial designation, and maintenance obligations would be detailed in the full bill text or accompanying fiscal notes.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary once you provide the bill’s full text or key sections (e.g., sections on funding, administration, and site designation) to include precise provisions and figures.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.