WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 517

Medicaid Provider Networks

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Robin Bartleman and 9 co-sponsors

Authorizes a limited hardship license for those suspended for noncompliance with child support orders to maintain work access while pursuing repayment.

Died in Rules
#subjectindex #socialwelfare
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 517

Summary — HB 517

Title: Driver's license; authorize issuance of hardship license to persons suspended for being out of compliance with order of support
Subject: Judiciary A
Introduced: November 12, 2024
Status: Died in Committee

Note: The documents you provided contain several unrelated HB 517 drafts from different states and topics. No full text or fiscal/policy analysis for the specific “hardship license for persons suspended for being out of compliance with order of support” bill was included. The summary below therefore (A) states what is known from the bill title and status and (B outlines the typical intent, common provisions, affected parties, and likely impacts for bills of this type. If you can provide the bill text or a link, I will produce a detailed, text‑accurate summary.

Main purpose and intent

From the bill title, HB 517 sought to authorize issuance of a hardship (limited) driver’s license to individuals whose regular driver’s license had been suspended because they were not in compliance with a court order of support (commonly child support). The primary policy intent of such bills is to reduce collateral consequences of license suspension — particularly barriers to employment and access to services — while still encouraging compliance with support obligations.

Typical key provisions (inferred)

Because the bill text was not provided, the following items are commonly included in hardship‑license proposals and likely reflect what HB 517 would have contained:
- Authorization for a limited/hardship license for persons whose licenses are suspended solely for noncompliance with an order of support.
- Eligibility criteria, e.g.:
- Proof of inability to otherwise obtain transportation for work, medical care, or child care;
- Evidence the applicant is participating in a court‑approved payment plan or has demonstrated a good‑faith effort to resolve arrears;
- No other disqualifying offenses (e.g., DUI).
- Scope and restrictions of the hardship license (hours, geographic limits, permitted purposes such as employment, medical appointments, education, or child‑care).
- Application process and required documentation (filing with the motor vehicle agency or court certification).
- Fees, monitoring, and enforcement mechanisms (e.g., ignition interlock, reporting requirements, suspension/revocation for violations).
- Interaction with existing enforcement for child‑support noncompliance (e.g., license reinstated if arrears remain but applicant meets conditions).
- Effective date and any sunset/implementation provisions.

Who would be affected

  • Primary: Individuals with driver’s license suspensions resulting from failure to comply with orders of support (often low‑income parents).
  • Secondary: Employers (improved employee mobility), courts and child‑support enforcement agencies (may change compliance dynamics), state motor vehicle agencies (administrative workload), and state budget (administrative costs; potential changes in support collections).
  • Public safety and traffic enforcement: limited‑license frameworks typically include safeguards to avoid increasing risk.

Procedural / timeline aspects

  • Introduced: November 12, 2024.
  • Final status: Died in Committee (no enactment).
  • Because it did not advance out of committee, no implementation timeline, funding, or agency rulemaking took effect.

Potential impacts (general)

  • Positive: May improve employment access and child‑support payment capacity; reduce unintended hardship from license suspensions.
  • Administrative: Motor vehicle agencies and courts may need new procedures, forms, staff training, and modest funding.
  • Fiscal: Likely small net fiscal effects — administrative costs partially offset by increased employment and possibly improved support collection — but actual fiscal impact depends on eligibility criteria and application volume.

Next steps / offer

If you want a precise, statutory‑level summary, please provide:
- The full bill text or a link to it; or
- The jurisdiction (state) and bill sponsor(s) so I can locate the official text.

I can then produce a detailed, clause‑by‑clause summary, list of exact eligibility tests, enforcement language, and any fiscal notes or committee reports associated with HB 517.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.