WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 397

Makes various changes relating to alternative medicine. (BDR 54-117)

2025 Regular Session Introduced by James Ohrenschall

Nevada bill SB 397 proposed modifications to alternative medicine licensing and regulations but stalled in committee without advancing to substantive debate.

(Pursuant to Joint Standing Rule No. 14.3.1, no further action allowed.)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 397

Legislative bill overview

SB 397 proposes unspecified changes to Nevada's alternative medicine regulations and licensing framework. The bill was introduced by Senator James Ohrenschall but did not advance beyond the initial committee referral stage before becoming inactive under legislative rules.

Why is this important

Alternative medicine regulation affects Nevada consumers' access to practitioners like acupuncturists, naturopaths, and herbalists, while also impacting business licensing and scope-of-practice standards. Changes to these regulations can influence both consumer protection standards and the ability of alternative practitioners to operate legally.

Potential points of contention

  • Scope clarification: The bill's specific changes are not publicly detailed in available records, making it difficult to assess whether it expands or restricts alternative practitioner authority
  • Consumer protection vs. market access: Potential tension between ensuring adequate practitioner oversight and maintaining affordable access to alternative healthcare options
  • Definition of "alternative medicine": Disagreement over which practices should be regulated as medicine versus wellness services, affecting regulatory burden

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.