WeVote
Log In

Bill

MG

Bill

HR 8882

Main Street Competes Act

119th Congress Introduced by Maggie Goodlander and 2 co-sponsors

The bill requires regular DOJ and FTC antitrust reporting to the SBA, with data-driven analysis on how enforcement affects small businesses and recommendations for action.

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 8882

Overview

The Main Street Competes Act (HR 8882, 119th Congress) seeks to examine and strengthen how federal antitrust enforcement affects the competitiveness of small businesses. The bill would amend the Small Business Economic Policy Act of 1980 to require regular reporting from federal antitrust agencies and to empower the Office of Advocacy within the Small Business Administration to analyze and summarize those reports, with an emphasis on competition, small business growth, and potential legislative or administrative actions.

Purpose and intent

  • Promote competitive markets and consumer choice by enforcing federal antitrust laws in ways that protect small businesses.
  • Assess how antitrust enforcement, including actions against anticompetitive conduct and illegal mergers, impacts small business competitiveness and growth.
  • Provide a mechanism for data-driven evaluation and recommendations to improve competition and remedy anticompetitive conduct affecting small businesses.

Key provisions

  • Amends Section 302(a) of the Small Business Economic Policy Act to:
    • Insert a broader policy goal that includes promoting competitive markets, consumer choice, and business ownership through antitrust enforcement.
  • Amends Section 303 to establish a formal reporting framework:
    • Specified entities (the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission) must, within 180 days after the end of the fiscal year in which the act is enacted and then every two fiscal years, submit to the SBA Chief Counsel for Advocacy a report containing:
    • An analysis of how antitrust enforcement promoted competition in the prior year, including effects on illegal mergers and small-business harm.
    • The number of complaints filed by self-identified small businesses, categorized by offense type and applicable antitrust laws.
    • The number of inquiries, investigations, and enforcement actions taken in response to small-business complaints.
    • The number of investigations/enforcement actions opened for reasons other than small-business complaints to deter and remedy anticompetitive conduct harming small businesses.
  • Adds a new definitions section (Section 304) to clarify:
    • Antitrust violation and federal antitrust laws (broadly including Section 5 of the FTC Act where it applies to unfair methods of competition).
    • Small business as defined by the Small Business Act.
    • Specified entities as the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission.

Who is affected

  • Federal antitrust enforcement agencies: Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission (as “specified entities”).
  • Small businesses: those that file complaints or are impacted by anticompetitive conduct or mergers.
  • Office of Advocacy within the SBA: responsible for receiving, aggregating, and reporting data, and for issuing follow-on analyses and recommendations to Congress.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • The act is retrofitted into the Small Business Economic Policy Act with a new reporting cadence:
    • Initial specified-entity report due within 180 days after enactment of the bill following its fiscal year end.
    • Subsequent reports due every two fiscal years.
  • The SBA Chief Counsel for Advocacy must, within 180 days of receiving each report, produce a Senate/House committee-delivered synthesis, including industry-by-industry analysis and recommendations for administrative or legislative actions to promote competition and deter/ remedy anticompetitive conduct.

Potential impact

  • Creates a structured, periodic evaluation of how antitrust enforcement affects small businesses.
  • Could influence policy discussions by highlighting gaps in enforcement or areas where competition could be strengthened for small firms.
  • Provides data-driven options for administrative changes or legislative reforms to enhance small-business competitiveness in the marketplace.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.