WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 4646

Local road and related infrastructure improvements in an area near the city of Rogers appropriation

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Cal Bahr

The bill would authorize state funding for local road and related infrastructure improvements near Rogers, Minnesota.

Referred to Capital Investment
#appropriations #citiesandtowns-specific #highways #roads #andbridges
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 4646

Summary of SF 4646 (Minnesota) – Local road and related infrastructure improvements near the city of Rogers appropriation

Overview

  • Session: 2025-2026
  • Jurisdiction: Minnesota
  • Title: Local road and related infrastructure improvements in an area near the city of Rogers appropriation
  • Status: Introduction and first reading (as of 2026-03-23); referred to the Capital Investment committee
  • Sponsor: Primary sponsor not listed; co-sponsor: Cal Bahr

This bill appears to authorize a state appropriation dedicated to local road and related infrastructure improvements in the vicinity of the city of Rogers, Minnesota. The exact dollar amount, scope, and project list are not provided in the available summary. The bill is categorized under capital investments, indicating it would fund construction, improvements, or related activities rather than ongoing operating expenses.

Purpose and Intent

  • To fund local road and related infrastructure improvements near Rogers, Minnesota.
  • To address transportation needs in a defined area adjacent to the city, likely including roads, bridges, drainage, traffic signals, and potentially adjacent utilities or drainage improvements that support mobility and safety.
  • As an appropriation bill within the Capital Investment framework, its primary goal is to accelerate or enable specific local capital projects through state funding.

Key Provisions (as typically found in capital investment bills of this type)

  • Appropriation authorization: Allocation of state resources for designated local infrastructure projects near Rogers.
  • Project scope (likely elements):
    • Road resurfacing, reconstruction, or widening
    • Intersection improvements and traffic signal upgrades
    • Bridge or culvert replacements or repairs
    • Stormwater drainage or utility coordination associated with roadwork
    • Pedestrian/bicycle accommodations if included in the funded scope
  • Administration and oversight: Provisions usually specify project management, reporting requirements, and compliance with state procurement and environmental review processes.
  • Matching funds or local contributions: Some capital projects require local funding matches or in-kind contributions; the presence of such requirements would be defined in the bill or accompanying fiscal notes.
  • Timelines: Projects funded by the appropriation would typically have schedule milestones (e.g., design, permitting, construction readiness, and completion dates).

Who would be affected

  • Local government and residents of the Rogers area: Beneficiaries of improved roads, safety enhancements, and potential economic development stemming from enhanced infrastructure.
  • State budget and capital projects administration: Responsible for allocating funds, contract oversight, and ensuring compliance with state procurement, environmental, and labor standards.
  • Contractors and engineers: Potential bidders and performers of design and construction work for the approved projects.

Procedural and Timeline Considerations

  • Current stage: Introduction and first reading; referred to Capital Investment committee. As such, the bill will be examined for fiscal impact, project scope, cost estimates, and alignment with state transportation/capital priorities.
  • Next steps: Committee analysis, possible amendments, hearings, and eventual floor votes in the Senate. If advanced, a companion House bill (if any) would progress in parallel or be coordinated.

Notes

  • The available information does not include the exact appropriation amount, project list, or specific performance timelines. Those details would typically be included in the bill’s fiscal note and the author’s fiscal statement, as well as any attached exhibit or project list.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to emphasize particular aspects (e.g., fiscal impact, project types, or timelines) or incorporate any additional language from the bill text once it becomes available.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.