WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 5118

Local government aid reduced for denial of projects that would expand tax base.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Paul Anderson and 5 co-sponsors

HF 5118 would cut county program aid or local government aid for counties and cities that deny tax-base–expanding development, and restore aid only after the tax base grows.

Authors added Murphy and Perryman
#governmentaloperations-local #taxation
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 5118

Summary of HF 5118 (2025-2026) — Minnesota

Purpose and intent

HF 5118 proposes a new penalty mechanism: if a county or city denies approval for a local development project that would increase the jurisdiction’s property tax base, that jurisdiction’s state aid (specifically county program aid or local government aid) would be reduced. The intent is to incentivize local governments to approve development projects that would expand the tax base, by tying development approvals to the level of state aid received.

Key provisions and changes

  • New law creation: Adds a new statutory section [477A.0178], establishing a framework for aid reductions tied to denial of tax-base-expanding projects.

  • Aid reductions trigger (Subdivision 1):

    • If a county or city denies approval for a local development project that would have increased the jurisdiction’s property tax base, aid under chapters 477A.01 to 477A.03 must be reduced by an amount determined under subdivision 2.
    • The reduction is implemented by the Commissioner of Revenue, reducing:
    • County program aid for counties, and
    • Local government aid for cities.
    • The reductions apply in the aids payable year following certification under subdivision 3, and continue until certification under subdivision 4.
    • Any aid payment cannot drop below zero; if a reduction exceeds a single payment, the excess is applied to future payments until the total reduction is satisfied.

  • Calculation of reduction (Subdivision 2):

    • The total aid reduction equals the product of two figures certified under subdivision 3:
    • Clause (2): A specific amount related to the jurisdiction’s situation (see Subd. 3 for details).
    • Clause (3): The corresponding associated amount used in the calculation.

  • Certification of reduction (Subdivision 3):

    • On July 1 each year, the governing body of any county or city that, in the past year, denied a development that would have increased the jurisdiction’s property tax base must provide to the Commissioner of Revenue:
    • The jurisdiction’s taxable net tax capacity in the current taxes payable year.
    • The jurisdiction’s net tax capacity tax rate for the current year.
    • The amount of growth in net tax capacity that would have occurred if the development had not been denied.
    • The Commissioner of Revenue certifies the aid reductions for jurisdictions providing this notification.

  • Reinstatement of aid (Subdivision 4):

    • If a jurisdiction’s taxable net tax capacity later exceeds the sum of:
    • The current year’s taxable net tax capacity (clause 1), plus
    • The growth amount (clause 3),
    • The jurisdiction must notify the Commissioner, who then verifies and certifies that aid reductions are no longer applicable.
    • Beginning with aids payable in the following year, reductions cease, unless the jurisdiction issues a new notice under Subdivision 3(a).

  • Effective date: The act would take effect on June 30, 2027.

Who would be affected

  • Counties: Any county that denies a tax-base-expanding development project within the past year could face reductions in county program aid under the existing aid programs (as administered in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 477A.01–.03).
  • Cities: Any city that denies such development could face reductions in Local Government Aid (LGA).

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Annual certification cycle: The process hinges on annual certification by the Governor/Commissioner of Revenue on July 1, based on the jurisdiction’s notified figures.
  • Notification requirements: Jurisdictions must notify the Commissioner of Revenue if they deny a qualifying development and must also notify when their tax base has grown to trigger reinstatement.
  • Phased reductions: Reductions apply to the next aids payable year after certification and continue until reinstatement occurs.
  • Cap on reductions: No single aid payment may go negative; excess reductions are carried forward to future payments until fully satisfied.
  • Delay until effective date: The policy becomes effective in mid-2027, allowing time for adjustments if enacted this session.

Summary assessment

HF 5118 introduces a mandatory, growth-based penalty tool linking development approvals to state aid levels. It aims to nudge local governments toward approving development that would expand the tax base by reducing aid when such approvals are denied, with a formal certification and reinstatement mechanism. The policy creates a two-way dynamic: a potential aid reduction when development is denied and restoration when the jurisdiction’s tax base grows beyond the threshold.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.