WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 2422

Local correctional officers provision in Peace Officers Discipline Procedures Act

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Heather Gustafson and 3 co-sponsors

Minnesota would extend PODPA disciplinary procedures to local correctional officers, standardizing investigations, hearings, and due process across local jails.

Referred to Judiciary and Public Safety
#lawenforcement #publicsafetyandpublicsafetydepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 2422

Summary of SF 2422 (2025-2026) — Local Correctional Officers Provision in Peace Officers Discipline Procedures Act

Overview

SF 2422 seeks to amend Minnesota law by adding a local correctional officers provision to the Peace Officers Discipline Procedures Act (PODPA). The bill is authored with multiple co-sponsors and was introduced on March 13, 2025, and referred to the Judiciary and Public Safety committees.

  • Jurisdiction: Minnesota
  • Session: 2025-2026
  • Title: Local correctional officers provision in Peace Officers Discipline Procedures Act
  • Introduced / First Reading: March 13, 2025
  • Committee Referral: Judiciary and Public Safety
  • Sponsors:
    • Judy Seeberger (co-sponsor)
    • Heather Gustafson (co-sponsor)
    • Warren Limmer (co-sponsor)
    • Eric Pratt (co-sponsor)

Purpose and Intent

The bill’s stated aim is to extend or tailor the disciplinary framework established by the Peace Officers Discipline Procedures Act to include local correctional officers. This would integrate correctional officers into the existing discipline procedures that govern peace officers, with attention to how investigations, charges, hearings, and determinations are conducted at the local level.

  • The intent appears to be ensuring consistency between the discipline processes for law enforcement officers and local correctional personnel.
  • The measure would address accountability and professional standards for correctional officers within Minnesota’s local jurisdictions.

Key Provisions (What the Bill Would Do)

While the full text is not provided here, the bill’s title and context indicate the following likely elements:

  • Inclusion of Local Correctional Officers under PODPA: Local correctional officers would be covered by the discipline procedures outlined in PODPA, expanding or adapting existing processes to include corrections staff.
  • Disciplinary Procedures: The bill would establish or reference procedures for investigation, notice, hearing rights, evidence standards, and adjudication related to disciplinary matters involving local correctional officers.
  • Due Process Protections: The act would preserve or extend due process protections for officers subject to discipline, potentially including the right to representation, notification timelines, and appeal processes.
  • Scope and Definitions: The bill would define terms such as “local correctional officer,” “discipline,” “complaint,” and related terms to clarify who is covered and under what circumstances.
  • Interagency and Local Jurisdictional Coordination: Mechanisms may be provided for coordinating between state PODPA provisions and local jail or institution policies.

Who Would Be Affected

  • Local Correctional Officers: Employees working in city/county jails and other local detention facilities who would fall under PODPA’s discipline framework.
  • Local Agencies/Jails/Detention Facilities: Employers responsible for implementing the discipline procedures, investigations, and hearings for their correctional staff.
  • Law Enforcement and Public Safety Community: Broader professional standards and accountability structures, potentially harmonizing disciplinary rules across police and corrections personnel.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction and Referral: The bill was introduced and referred to the Judiciary and Public Safety committees on March 13, 2025.
  • Next Steps: If advanced, the bill would undergo committee hearings, potential amendments, floor votes in the Minnesota Legislature, and eventual consideration by the governor. Detailed timelines would depend on committee calendars and legislative priorities.

Potential Impacts and Considerations

  • Consistency and Accountability: Aligning local correctional officer discipline with PODPA could improve consistency in accountability mechanisms and due process protections.
  • Local Implementation: Changes would require local agencies to adapt policies, training, and administrative processes to meet the new standard.
  • Resource Implications: Jails and detention facilities might need to allocate resources for investigations, hearings, and potential personnel changes resulting from disciplinary actions.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to a specific section of the bill once the full text is available, or compare SF 2422 to existing PODPA language to highlight exact procedural changes.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.