WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 1267

Limitations on Collection Actions for Medical Debt

2026 Regular Session

HB 1267 limits medical debt collection actions in Colorado, protecting residents from aggressive tactics like wage garnishment while addressing the leading cause of personal ban...

House Committee on Health & Human Services Postpone Indefinitely
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 1267

Legislative bill overview

HB 1267 would impose limitations on collection actions related to medical debt in Colorado. While the full bill text isn't provided, such legislation typically restricts debt collectors' ability to pursue certain medical debts through lawsuits, wage garnishment, or other aggressive collection tactics. This type of bill often includes provisions like extended statute of limitations, exemptions for certain types of medical debt, or requirements for validation and notice procedures before collection actions commence.

Why is this important

Medical debt is the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States. Many Colorado residents face significant financial hardship when medical expenses result in collection actions. Limiting aggressive collection practices could protect consumers from wage garnishment and asset seizure while still allowing legitimate debt recovery. This also addresses equity concerns, as medical debt disproportionately affects low-income and uninsured populations.

Potential points of contention

Healthcare providers and debt collection agencies will likely argue that limiting collection actions reduces their ability to recover legitimate debts, potentially increasing costs passed to other patients. There may be debate over which types of medical debt qualify for protection and whether exemptions are too broad or too narrow. Hospitals and creditors may claim restrictions create unfair advantages for medical debtors compared to other consumer debt. Additionally, questions may arise regarding the financial impact on smaller medical practices versus large health systems, and whether the bill adequately balances consumer protection with creditors' rights to pursue valid claims.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.