WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 740

Limit Contractor Liability in State Contracts.

2025-2026 Session

HB 740 would cap contractor liability to the State on most contracts at 2x contract value, with possible rise to 3x after risk review, reshaping bids and insurance costs.

Withdrawn From Com
#bids&bidding;contracts;disasters&emergencies;emergencymanagement;emergencyservices;informationtechnology;internet;public;purchasing;reporting;telecommunications;teleservices;liability;electronicgovernment;informationtechnologydept.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 740

Summary — HB 740: Limit Contractor Liability in State Contracts (Constituent Portal/Contractor Liability Limit)

Status: Withdrawn from committee (bill filed 11/12/2024). Multiple introduced/committee versions exist; this summary describes the bill’s core intent, key provisions, variations across drafts, affected parties, fiscal items, and procedural/timeline elements.

Main purpose

HB 740 has two linked objectives:
1. Direct the Department of Information Technology (DIT) to issue an RFP to develop a centralized, disaster‑focused constituent engagement portal that aggregates state agency disaster resources and enables real‑time constituent interaction.
2. Require state procurement contracts (Chapter 143, Article 3 and Article 8) to include express limits on contractor liability to the State, establishing presumptive caps and processes for increasing or validating higher caps.

Key provisions

  • Disaster portal (Part I)

    • DIT must issue a request for proposals to develop a disaster‑focused constituent engagement portal consolidating relevant agency information and services.
    • Appropriation: $500,000 (one‑time/nonrecurring) to DIT for FY 2025–26 to support RFP/development activities (in some drafts the effective/implementation date is specified as July 1, 2025).

  • Contractor liability limits (Part II)

    • All covered state contracts must include a limitation on the contractor’s liability to the State for damages.
    • Presumptive cap: no more than two times the contract value.
    • Exception to presumptive cap: the cap may be increased to up to three times the contract value if:
    • The Secretary (or designee) conducts a pre‑solicitation risk assessment determining a higher cap is necessary; and
    • The solicitation/RFP clearly states the increased liability requirement.
    • The Secretary must reasonably determine that the contractor has sufficient financial resources (including insurance or third‑party backing) to satisfy the agreed limitation.
    • Exclusions from the limitation: liability for intentional or willful misconduct, damage to tangible personal property, and bodily injury (physical injuries to persons).
    • Annual reporting: Secretary must report by March 1 each year to specified legislative oversight bodies listing contracts with liability amounts greater than two times contract value.
    • (Committee substitute version additions) Secretary may impose a review fee (up to $250) to assess a contractor’s financial resources; effective date in that draft is October 1, 2025.

Who is affected

  • State agencies that award procurement contracts under Chapter 143 (procurement/purchasing authorities).
  • Private contractors and vendors bidding on or performing state contracts (liability exposure and insurance requirements).
  • Department of Information Technology (role in portal RFP and use of appropriated funds).
  • Taxpayers (one‑time appropriation and potential impacts on contract pricing/insurance costs).
  • Oversight committees that will receive annual reporting on liability exceptions.

Procedural and timeline notes

  • Versions: multiple drafts exist (initial “first edition” includes the $500k appropriation and July 1, 2025 portal effective date; later committee substitute refines liability language, adds a $250 review fee, and sets an October 1, 2025 effective date for the liability section). Check the enacted text (if any) for the final effective date and any differences.
  • Application: the liability provisions apply to contracts awarded, renewed, or amended on or after the bill’s effective date.
  • Reporting: annual March 1 legislative report on contracts exceeding the presumptive liability cap.
  • Current status: bill was withdrawn from committee according to the provided metadata; it has seen hearings and amendments in multiple committee stages in some drafts.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Procurement: standardizing liability caps may reduce negotiation variability, speed contracting, and lower contractor insurance/price unpredictability — but higher caps (2–3x contract value) and the State’s insistence on contractor financial sufficiency could affect bidder interest or pricing.
  • Risk allocation: the bill shifts more predictable, capped financial exposure onto contractors while preserving unlimited liability for willful misconduct and bodily injury.
  • Implementation costs: one‑time $500,000 appropriation to develop the portal; administrative costs to perform risk assessments and produce the required annual reports.
  • Legal/contract drafting: agencies will need updated standard contract language and procedures to implement the new limits, risk assessments, and documentation requirements.

If you want, I can:
- Produce a side‑by‑side comparison of the different editions (first edition vs. committee substitute) or
- Draft suggested contract language and risk‑assessment checklist consistent with the bill’s requirements.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.