WeVote

Bill

Bill

B 26-0157

Langston Slater Surplus Declaration and Disposition Approval Act of 2025

26th Council Period (2025-2026) Introduced by Phil Mendelson

Declares Langston Slater surplus and authorizes its sale, lease, or transfer with appraisals, bidding, and proceeds for capital projects, affecting DC agencies and the public.

Act A26-0343 Published in DC Register Vol 73 and Page 009159
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · B 26-0157

Summary of Bill B 26-0157: Langston Slater Surplus Declaration and Disposition Approval Act of 2025

What is known about the bill

  • Bill number and title: B 26-0157, Langston Slater Surplus Declaration and Disposition Approval Act of 2025
  • Status: Notice of Intent to Act on B26-0157 published in the District of Columbia Register
  • Introduced: February 28, 2025
  • Introduced by: Chairman Mendelson
  • Current legislative actions:
    • February 28, 2025: Introduced at the Office of the Secretary
    • March 4, 2025: Referred to the Committee on Facilities and the Committee on Business and Economic Development
    • March 7, 2025: Notice of Intent to Act on B26-0157 published in the DC Register

Purpose and intent (inferred from the title)

The bill appears to authorize the District of Columbia to declare a property or asset identified as “Langston Slater” as surplus and to approve its disposition. The exact nature of the asset (e.g., real property, facility, or other District-controlled asset) and the intended form of disposition (sale, lease, transfer, or other conveyance) would be specified in the bill’s text. The overarching aim is typically to enable the government to manage surplus real property and to authorize its sale or other disposition under defined terms.

Key provisions and changes (illustrative, based on standard surplus disposition statutes)

Note: The precise statutory language is not provided here; the following outlines are based on common elements in surplus declaration and disposition laws. The actual bill may include variations or additional provisions.

  • Declaration of surplus: Official determination that the Langston Slater asset is no longer needed for public use and may be disposed of.
  • Disposition authorization: Authorization for the District to dispose of the surplus asset through sale, lease, transfer, or other approved means.
  • Procurement and appraisal requirements: Requirements for appraisals, competitive bidding or transparent procurement processes, and fair-market value considerations.
  • Use of proceeds: Provisions specifying how sale or lease proceeds may be used (e.g., funding for capital projects, debt service, or designated programs).
  • Protection of public interests: Environmental, zoning, and land-use compliance; notices and opportunities for public comment or input.
  • Reporting and accountability: Reporting obligations to the Council or relevant committees, including post-disposition audits or status updates.
  • Timelines: Deadlines for appraisals, bidding, award, and transfer of ownership or control.

Who would be affected

  • District government agencies: Particularly the office or department currently administering the Langston Slater asset and any agencies involved in the disposition process.
  • Potential buyers or lessees: Private sector entities or other public entities that may acquire or lease the surplus asset.
  • General public and stakeholders: Depending on the asset’s location and use, nearby residents, businesses, and community organizations could be affected by the disposition outcomes.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • The bill has progressed from introduction to committee referrals, indicating it will undergo committee review, potential hearings, and amendments before any floor action.
  • The Notice of Intent to Act published March 7, 2025 signals a readiness to move forward in the legislative process, subject to committee consideration and potential votes.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Fiscal impact: Potential generation of revenue or savings from disposal; use of proceeds may affect District budgets or capital plans.
  • Urban planning and development: Disposition outcomes could influence land use, neighborhood development, or public service delivery depending on the asset’s location.
  • Public transparency: The disposition process typically includes safeguards for fair process, public notice, and accountability.

Next steps for readers

  • Monitor DC Register notices and Committee on Facilities and Committee on Business and Economic Development activities for hearings, amendments, or revised language.
  • Review the bill’s text once publicly available to understand specific asset details, disposition pathways, financial terms, and reporting requirements.
  • Consider how the Langston Slater asset’s disposition might affect local planning, development opportunities, or community interests.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.