WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 2146

Juvenile Offenders - As enacted, specifies that if a student is referred to juvenile court for being unlawfully absent from school and is ultimately adjudicated to be unruly, that the disposition made by the juvenile judge or magistrate may include the suspension of the student's driving privileges or ability to obtain a driver license for a period of up to one year. - Amends TCA Title 37; Title 49, Chapter 6, Part 30 and Title 55, Chapter 10.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Renea Jones

Tennessee bill allows juvenile courts to suspend student driving privileges up to one year for school truancy adjudicated as "unruly" to incentivize attendance.

Comp. became Pub. Ch. 853
#juvenileoffenders
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 2146

Legislative bill overview

HB 2146 allows juvenile court judges and magistrates to suspend or delay a student's driving privileges for up to one year if the student is adjudicated as "unruly" following a referral for unlawful school absence. The bill amends Tennessee's juvenile justice code and driver licensing statutes to create this connection between school attendance violations and driving rights.

Why is this important

School truancy is a documented risk factor for negative outcomes, and this bill uses driving privileges—a significant incentive for teenagers—as leverage to encourage attendance. However, it links a civil education matter (school attendance) to significant consequences affecting a minor's mobility and independence, which could have ripple effects on employment, transportation, and family dynamics.

Potential points of contention

  • Proportionality concern: Whether suspending driving privileges for up to one year is an appropriate response to school absences, particularly when the underlying offense is classified as "unruly" rather than a more serious crime
  • Socioeconomic impact: The policy may disproportionately affect low-income students who depend on driving for school transportation, jobs, or family responsibilities, potentially worsening attendance issues rather than improving them
  • Judicial discretion and consistency: The language "may include" gives judges broad discretion, raising questions about whether similar cases will be treated consistently across different jurisdictions and courtrooms

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.