WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 77

Juvenile Offenders - As introduced, requires a juvenile 16 years of age or older accused of a delinquent act to be transferred from juvenile court to criminal court to be tried as an adult if the juvenile has a prior adjudication of delinquency for any offense and the juvenile court finds probable cause to believe the juvenile committed the delinquent act. - Amends TCA Title 37; Title 39 and Chapter 1007 of the Public Acts of 2024.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026)

NC HB 77 requires agencies to assess cumulative impacts on low-income/minority communities and can deny permits if adverse effects, including public health, are disproportionate.

Assigned to s/c Criminal Justice Subcommittee
#juvenileoffenders
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 77

Summary — HB 77 (Environmental Justice)

Status: Passed 1st Reading
Introduced: Feb 10, 2025 (filed) — Effective date in bill text: July 1, 2025 (applies to many pending applications as noted)

Note: Multiple bill texts named “HB 77” exist in various states and on other topics. This summary covers the Environmental Justice bill (North Carolina HB 77, Session 2025) — the version that amends multiple state environmental and permitting statutes to require cumulative‑impact and environmental‑justice considerations and to strengthen public participation for “overburdened” communities.

Purpose / Intent

To require state permitting and environmental review processes to account for the cumulative impacts of proposed actions on low‑income and minority communities (as protected under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act) and to provide enhanced public participation opportunities for decisions that would affect overburdened communities. The bill explicitly includes public‑health effects in the definition of “adverse impact.”

Key provisions

  • Requires cumulative‑impact analysis:
    • Adds a requirement that agencies consider "the cumulative impact of the proposed action (including the impact on public health)" in relation to other similar impacts in the community.
    • This requirement appears across multiple statutes governing permitting, remediation, and environmental review.
  • Authorizes permit denials where impacts would be disproportionate:
    • Agencies/commissions must deny applications (or renewals/certificates) if they find the cumulative impact would have a disproportionate adverse effect on a low‑income or minority community (including public‑health impacts).
    • Specific permit types addressed include mining permits (G.S. 74‑51), solid waste management facility permits (G.S. 130A‑294), hazardous waste facility permitting standards (130A‑294(g)), general permit certificates/renewals (G.S. 143‑215.10C), and development/land‑use permits (G.S. 113A‑120).
  • Adds cumulative‑impact requirement to environmental documents:
    • State agencies must include statements about cumulative impacts on low‑income or minority communities in recommendations/reports for projects using public money or land (G.S. 113A‑4).
  • Requires remedial planning to analyze cumulative impacts:
    • Remedial investigation and remedial action plans must include analysis of cumulative impacts (G.S. 130A‑310.69).
  • Public participation:
    • The bill emphasizes development of permitting standards with public participation and provides for enhanced public participation opportunities for permitting decisions affecting overburdened communities (text provides for public involvement although full procedural details are in the bill’s longer sections).
  • Scope/limits:
    • Some provisions expressly apply “to the extent required by federal law” (e.g., the solid waste section).
    • “Adverse impact” explicitly includes impacts on public health.
  • Effective timing:
    • Most sections become effective July 1, 2025, and explicitly apply to applications or documents pending on that date (i.e., the new standards apply to some pending matters).

Who is affected

  • State agencies that issue environmental permits and prepare environmental documents (DEQ/Department of Environmental Quality, permitting commissions, etc.).
  • Applicants and operators seeking permits for mining, solid waste facilities, hazardous‑waste facilities, development projects, remediation actions, and holders of general permits.
  • Low‑income and minority communities (protected under Title VI) — the bill is designed to protect these “overburdened” communities by requiring consideration of cumulative harms.
  • The public — will have expanded opportunities for participation in permitting decisions that affect overburdened communities.

Procedural / timeline aspects

  • Most provisions take effect July 1, 2025.
  • Several sections explicitly state they apply to applications, permits, or environmental documents pending on that date.
  • Agencies will need to incorporate cumulative‑impact analyses and modify permit review procedures and public‑participation processes promptly after the effective date.

Potential impacts

  • Increased analytic requirements for permit applicants (cumulative impact and public‑health analyses) and for agencies reviewing permits.
  • Potential for additional public hearings or comment periods when proposed actions affect overburdened communities.
  • Greater likelihood that permits could be delayed, conditioned, or denied where cumulative impacts are found to be disproportionate.
  • Possible increases in administrative costs for agencies and applicants to perform required analyses; potential for more litigation or Title VI‑related claims.
  • Intended benefit: reduce disproportionate environmental and public‑health burdens on historically overburdened communities.

If you want, I can: (1) extract and list the specific statutory sections amended with exact bill language, (2) draft a short briefing for an agency on compliance steps, or (3) prepare a one‑page FAQ for community groups. Which would be most useful?

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.