WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 1755

judges; law practice prohibition; exceptions

57th Legislature - Second Regular Session Introduced by Mark Finchem

SB 1755 prohibits Arizona judges from practicing law while serving on the bench, establishing narrow exceptions for specified judicial activities to prevent conflicts of interest.

DP
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 1755

Legislative bill overview

SB 1755 restricts judges from engaging in law practice while serving on the bench, with specified exceptions carved out for certain judicial activities. The bill defines which judicial functions judges may perform without violating the practice prohibition and establishes the scope of permissible judicial-related activities.

Why is this important

This bill addresses potential conflicts of interest and ethical concerns about judges maintaining private legal practices while presiding over cases. The distinction between prohibited and permitted activities affects judicial independence, public trust in the courts, and judges' ability to supplement their judicial income through legal work.

Potential points of contention

  • Scope of exceptions: What specific judicial activities qualify as exceptions and whether those exceptions are too broad or too narrow, potentially creating loopholes or undue restrictions
  • Income and recruitment impact: Restrictions on outside practice may reduce judicial compensation relative to private practice, potentially affecting the quality and diversity of judicial recruitment
  • Definition clarity: The precise definition of "law practice" and how it applies to different types of judicial work, consultation, or administrative activities may create ambiguity in enforcement

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.