WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

JRH 7

Joint resolution strongly supporting the existing U.S.-Denmark treaty related to Greenland and opposing American efforts to secure sovereignty over the island

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Sarita Austin and 27 co-sponsors

Vermont JRH 7 expresses opposition to U.S. sovereignty claims over Greenland and reaffirms support for the existing U.S.–Denmark treaty framework governing Greenland.

Read first time, treated as a bill, and referred to the Committee on Government Operations and Military Affairs
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · JRH 7

Bill overview

JRH 7 is a Joint Resolution in the Vermont 2025-2026 session. The resolution expresses strong political positions regarding the U.S.-Denmark treaty related to Greenland and opposes American efforts to secure sovereignty over Greenland. It recognizes and endorses the existing treaty framework with Denmark regarding Greenland and rejects ongoing or prospective U.S. moves to assert sovereignty over the island.

  • Jurisdiction: Vermont
  • Session: 2025-2026
  • Type: Joint Resolution (non-binding)
  • Primary purpose: To formally state Vermont’s position on federal treaty relations with Denmark concerning Greenland, reaffirm support for the current treaty arrangement, and oppose unilateral U.S. sovereignty claims over Greenland.

Main purpose and intent

  • Reiterate Vermont’s support for the current U.S.-Denmark treaty governing Greenland.
  • Oppose any American initiatives or actions aimed at establishing U.S. sovereignty over Greenland.
  • Signal alignment with Denmark on Greenland policy and reduce emphasis on alternative U.S. sovereignty efforts.

Key provisions and changes

As a joint resolution, JRH 7 would primarily:

  • Acknowledge the existing U.S.-Denmark treaty framework governing Greenland.
  • Declare opposition to any new or ongoing U.S. efforts to secure sovereignty over Greenland.
  • Affirm Vermont’s stance and/or policy preferences consistent with maintaining the treaty status quo with Denmark.
  • Potentially request or urge federal action in line with the resolution’s positions (e.g., instructing Vermont’s congressional delegation or state agencies to reflect this stance), though such requests are typical non-binding expressions rather than enforceable commitments.

Note: The bill text as provided does not indicate new regulatory or fiscal changes. The resolution’s effect is primarily symbolic and political, guiding state legislative sentiment and communications.

Who/what would be affected

  • Federal–Danish Greenland policy: Vermont’s formal position would align with Denmark on Greenland issues, potentially influencing Vermont’s communications to federal authorities.
  • Vermont’s governmental and political discourse: The resolution would steer state lawmakers, agencies, and constituents toward opposition to U.S. sovereignty actions over Greenland.
  • Stakeholders in Greenland policy discussions: Denmark, the United States government, and Greenland-related constituencies may view the resolution as a public expression of Vermont’s stance.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Action history: Read first time, treated as a bill, and referred to the Committee on Government Operations and Military Affairs on 2026-01-27.
  • Next steps likely include committee consideration, potential amendments, and a floor vote in the Vermont General Assembly.
  • As a non-binding resolution, it would not create new laws or allocate funds but would shape legislative sentiment and official communications.

Additional notes

  • Co-sponsors: A broad list of Vermont lawmakers is attached, indicating cross-party or cross-chamber support for expressing this stance.
  • If enacted as a resolution, the effect is advisory and symbolic, with no direct legal obligations on federal policy or funding.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.