WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 4340

Individuals who are less than 15 years old exempted from Minnesota Paid Leave Law.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Dawn Gillman and 5 co-sponsors

Exempts individuals under 15 from Minnesota’s Paid Leave Law, removing their eligibility and employer obligations for paid leave benefits.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy
#employmentandeconomicdevelopmentdepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 4340

Bill Summary — HF 4340 (2025-2026) — Minnesota

Title

Indicates that individuals who are under 15 years old would be exempted from Minnesota’s Paid Leave Law.

Intent and purpose

The bill appears to carve out an exemption from Minnesota’s Paid Leave Law for individuals under the age of 15. The primary aim is to exclude very young individuals from coverage or requirements related to paid leave mandating, as defined by Minnesota law.

Key provisions (as stated or implied by the title)

  • Exemption for individuals under 15 years old from the Minnesota Paid Leave Law.
  • The bill would modify who is covered by the paid leave requirements, removing or limiting applicability to workers younger than 15.
  • The text likely specifies whether the exemption applies to eligibility for paid leave benefits, accrual requirements, notification obligations, and/or employer administration of leave for this age group.

Who would be affected

  • Workers under 15 years of age in Minnesota.
  • Employers and payroll/HR systems that administer Minnesota Paid Leave benefits for employees.
  • State agencies enforcing or administering the Paid Leave Law.

Procedural/timeline notes

  • Introduction and first reading occurred on March 16, 2026.
  • The bill was referred to the Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy committee.
  • This placement suggests initial committee consideration, discussion of fiscal implications, and potential amendments before a full floor vote.

Sponsorship

  • Primary and co-sponsors include:
    • Cal Warwas
    • Natalie Zeleznikar
    • Bernie Perryman
    • Kristin Robbins
    • Roger Skraba
    • Dawn Gillman
  • The presence of multiple sponsors from varied affiliations can indicate cross-party interest in adjusting the scope of paid leave coverage.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Coverage shift: If enacted, employers would no longer be required to provide or administer paid leave for workers under 15, potentially reducing administrative complexity for this age group.
  • Compliance and enforcement: Definitions in the bill would clarify whether any existing leave benefits for under-15 workers are unaffected or are explicitly excluded from coverage.
  • Labor market effects: The exemption could affect internships, youth employment programs, and part-time work opportunities for younger teens, depending on current law’s reach and any related youth employment rules.
  • Fiscal impact: The committee referral to Labor and Economic Development Finance and Policy suggests consideration of any fiscal costs or savings to the state or to employers.

Notes for readers

  • The summary reflects the stated purpose in the bill title and the action history available. The full bill text would provide precise definitions (e.g., “employee,” “paid leave,” and any transitional provisions) and any exceptions or phased timelines.
  • If you are assessing impact for a business or advocacy perspective, review the exact language on effective dates, the scope of exemption, and how it interacts with other state and federal leave laws.

If you’d like, I can incorporate the exact statutory definitions and any fiscal notes from the bill text once available to provide a more precise analysis.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.