WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 4574

Individual income tax subtraction for firefighter pension income established.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Jeff Backer and 5 co-sponsors

Establishes a Minnesota tax subtraction for firefighter pension income to reduce taxable income and state tax liability for eligible firefighters.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Taxes
#fireandfirefighters #taxation-income
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 4574

Bill Summary: HF 4574 (2025-2026) – Individual Income Tax Subtraction for Firefighter Pension Income

Overview

HF 4574 proposes creating an individual income tax subtraction (a deduction from taxable income) for certain pension income received by firefighters. The bill is introduced in the Minnesota Legislature for the 2025-2026 session and has been assigned to the Taxes committee. The bill has several joint sponsors, indicating bipartisan support.

  • Jurisdiction: Minnesota
  • Bill Type: House File (HF)
  • Current Status: Introduction and first reading (as of 2026-03-23); referred to Taxes
  • Sponsors: Co-sponsors include Cal Warwas, Joe McDonald, Bryan Lawrence, Jim Nash, Jeff Backer, and Jeff Dotseth

Purpose and Intent

The primary aim of HF 4574 is to provide targeted tax relief to firefighters by allowing an annual subtraction from Minnesota taxable income for firefighter pension income. The intent is to recognize and ease the tax burden on retirees from the firefighting profession who receive pensions, potentially improving take-home pay in retirement.

Key Provisions (Proposed Provisions Based on the Title)

While the full statutory language is not provided here, the bill’s title indicates the following core elements:

  • Subtraction from Minnesota Taxable Income: Establishment of an individual income tax subtraction (deduction) specifically for pension income received by firefighters.
  • Eligibility for Subtraction: The deduction would apply to individuals receiving firefighter pension income. (Details such as whether it covers only retired firefighters, requires proof of eligibility, or applies to all firefighter pension plans in Minnesota would be defined in the bill’s text.)
  • Amount of Subtraction: The bill would specify a subtraction amount (flat dollar amount or a formula). The exact figure and any phase-in or cap are not stated in the available information.
  • Interaction with Other Provisions: The subtraction would reduce Minnesota taxable income, thereby reducing state income tax liability. It would interact with existing deductions/credits as defined by Minnesota tax law.

Affected Parties and Impacts

  • Primary Beneficiaries: Minnesota firefighters who receive pension income. Retirees from the firefighting profession who are currently taxed on pension income would likely benefit directly.
  • Taxpayers Overall: Other residents would see no direct impact unless mechanisms such as phased phase-ins or budgetary offsets are defined elsewhere in the bill or through fiscal notes.
  • State Revenue: The subtraction would reduce state taxable income for eligible retirees, potentially reducing state tax revenue. Legislative fiscal notes (not provided here) would detail estimated revenue impact and any administrative costs.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction and First Reading: 2026-03-23
  • Next Steps: Referral to the Taxes committee; subsequent committee hearings, amendments, and votes would shape the bill before floor action in the House. If advanced, the bill would move to the Senate (or companion legislation there) and proceed through the standard process to enactment.

Practical Considerations for Readers

  • The exact eligibility criteria, subtraction amount, annual inflation indexing (if any), interaction with other tax provisions, and sunset/expiration (if any) will be defined in the bill’s text and any fiscal notes.
  • Interested parties should monitor committee hearings and fiscal analyses for estimates of revenue impact and administrative feasibility.
  • As with most tax benefit proposals, questions often center on budgetary impact, fairness, administrative complexity, and whether the benefit is targeted narrowly to those who qualify (retired firefighters) or if it could be expanded.

If you’d like, I can pull the full text of HF 4574 and provide a line-by-line analysis of the provisions, eligibility criteria, and fiscal implications.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.