Increases the remedy for trademark counterfeiting

2025 Regular Session Introduced by James Sanders

The bill would strengthen remedies for trademark counterfeiting, enhancing enforcement options and potential penalties for counterfeiters.

REFERRED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION

Summary: Bill S 6616 — Increases the remedy for trademark counterfeiting

Overview

Bill S 6616, titled “Increases the remedy for trademark counterfeiting,” aims to strengthen the legal remedies available to address trademark counterfeiting. The bill was introduced on March 18, 2025 and has been referred to the Consumer Protection committee. The sponsor listed is James Sanders Jr. (primary).

Legislative status and process

Introduction date: March 18, 2025

Current status: Referred to Consumer Protection

Legislative actions recorded:

2025-03-18: REFERRED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION (noted twice in the action log)

Sponsor

Primary sponsor: James Sanders Jr.

Related legislation

The bill is connected to a series of prior-session bills, indicating an ongoing effort to reform trademark counterfeiting remedies. Related prior-session bills include:
- S 3794
- S 3366
- S 2111
- S 3247
- S 4775

What the bill would do

Based on the title, S 6616 would increase the remedies available for trademark counterfeiting. The specific changes to remedies (e.g., amount or form of damages, injunctive relief, attorney’s fees, treble damages, civil penalties, or criminal penalties) are not provided in the information available.

The exact text is not included here, so the precise scope, definitions (e.g., what constitutes counterfeiting, who may sue, types of remedies), and procedural requirements (timeline for actions, caps, or proof standards) cannot be detailed from the provided material.

Potential impact (high-level)

For trademark owners: Potentially stronger relief against counterfeiters, which could improve ability to deter and recover losses from infringement.

For counterfeiters: Likely heightened risk of civil liability and enforcement actions, potentially increasing costs and legal exposure.

For consumers and marketplaces: If strengthened, may reduce availability of counterfeit goods and improve brand integrity; could influence retailer compliance and supply-chain diligence.

For courts and enforcement: Could shift emphasis toward enhanced civil remedies and enforcement measures within consumer protection frameworks.

Next steps and considerations

Access to the bill text is needed to specify the exact remedies, thresholds, and processes proposed.

Monitor committee activity in Consumer Protection for hearings, amendments, and potential floor votes.

Consideration of fiscal impact, implementation logistics, and interaction with existing trademark laws and enforcement programs.

If you’d like, I can update this summary with precise provisions as soon as the bill’s text becomes available.