Bill
S 26
Allows Brookline to bylaw to prohibit or restrict second‑generation anticoagulant rodenticides within town limits.
Note on source material and inconsistencies
- The package of documents provided contains conflicting metadata (a title about STAR property tax deductions and an unrelated Massachusetts local bill authorizing the town of Brookline to prohibit second‑generation anticoagulant rodenticides). The full bill text and docket (Senate Docket No. 2613) describe a Brookline local-option pesticide restriction. This summary treats the Brookline rodenticide bill as the operative text and flags where procedural or sponsor information appears inconsistent.
Purpose and intent
- Allow the town of Brookline to enact a local bylaw that prohibits or restricts the use or application of second‑generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs). The intent is to give Brookline explicit local authority to regulate these pesticides despite any general law that might otherwise preclude such action.
Key provisions
- Section 1: Notwithstanding Chapter 132B of the Massachusetts General Laws or any other general or special law to the contrary, Brookline may, by bylaw, prohibit or restrict the application of second‑generation anticoagulant rodenticides within the town. This authorization expressly includes the ability to limit or prohibit application by licensed commercial applicators (as defined in 333 C.M.R. 10.00).
- Section 2: The act takes effect upon passage.
What the bill changes / legal effect
- Creates a specific local preemption exception in favor of Brookline: even if state law would otherwise regulate pesticide application uniformly, Brookline may adopt stricter local rules regarding SGARs.
- The bill is permissive (authorizes Brookline to act) rather than mandatory (it does not itself ban SGARs town‑wide; it allows the town to adopt a bylaw to do so).
Who would be affected
- Town of Brookline residents and property owners: local bylaws could change the availability and legal use of SGARs.
- Licensed commercial pesticide applicators and pest control businesses operating in Brookline: may face new local restrictions or prohibitions.
- Property managers, institutions, and municipal operations that use rodenticides.
- Non‑target wildlife, pets, and domestic animals could be affected indirectly if Brookline adopts restrictions intended to reduce secondary anticoagulant poisoning (the likely public‑health/environmental rationale).
- State regulators: the bill narrows the uniformity of state pesticide regulation by permitting a local exception for Brookline.
Procedural / timeline notes (from provided legislative actions)
- Filed in Massachusetts Senate (Senate Docket No. 2613) — filed 1/21/2025.
- Referred to Environment and Natural Resources committee (3/06/2025).
- House concurred (3/10/2025) — appears in the action list.
- Hearing scheduled for 10/27/2025 (listed twice).
- Reported favorably by committee and placed in the Orders of the Day (11/06/2025).
- Read second and ordered to third reading (11/19/2025).
- Some records show early referral to an “AGING” committee (1/08/2025) and a disparate list of sponsors that appear to include names from multiple jurisdictions; these items likely reflect data mismatches in the supplied materials.
Context and likely implications
- SGARs (commonly used rodenticides that can cause cumulative anticoagulation in predators and scavengers) have been the focus of local and state regulation due to wildlife and pet poisoning concerns. This bill would give Brookline the authority to adopt local restrictions tailored to community policy preferences and local ecological or public‑health concerns.
If enacted, the town would still need to adopt the specific bylaw language and enforcement provisions to implement any prohibition or restriction authorized by this act.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
