WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 1942

Increases Rockland county's annual minimum allocation through the MTA Dutchess-Orange-Rockland Fund (DORF)

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Bill Weber

Raises tax-code thresholds to $30M and broadens redevelopment tools to enable small-scale spot rehabilitation and neighborhood stabilization.

REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 1942

Summary — S.1942 (2025): "An Act relative to neighborhood stabilization and economic development"

Important note on document inconsistencies
- The metadata supplied (bill title referencing Rockland County / MTA DORF and sponsors such as U.S. Senators) conflicts with the actual bill text. The text filed as S.1942 amends Massachusetts General Laws and is titled “An Act relative to neighborhood stabilization and economic development.” This summary reflects the content of the bill text provided (Massachusetts statutory amendments), not the mismatched metadata about Rockland/MTA.

Purpose and intent
- The bill seeks to promote neighborhood stabilization and local economic development by (1) increasing certain statutory dollar thresholds in the Massachusetts tax code and (2) modernizing and expanding redevelopment/urban-renewal authorities’ tools — particularly enabling small-scale “spot rehabilitation” projects and defining sponsors and eligible properties.

Key provisions
1. Increase of specified statutory dollar figures
- Amends:
- paragraph (5) of subsection (q) of section 6 of chapter 62 (Mass. General Laws): replaces “$10,000,000” with “$30,000,000”.
- subsection (5) of section 38BB of chapter 63: likewise replaces “$10,000,000” with “$30,000,000”.
- Effect: triples the referenced dollar figures/caps used in these tax-code provisions (the bill text does not restate the programs these figures cap).

  1. Adds “neighborhood stabilization” to chapter 70B

    • Section 3 inserts the phrase “neighborhood stabilization,” into the purposes/authority language of chapter 70B.

  2. Substantial revisions to chapter 121A (redevelopment/housing law)

    • Replaces definitions for “decadent area,” “sub-standard area,” and “project” with broader, updated language emphasizing blight conditions and redevelopment.
    • Adds new definitions to enable small-scale interventions:
      • “Spot Blight Project Sponsor” — community development corporations, qualifying nonprofits, redevelopment authorities, or partnerships approved to rehabilitate spot properties.
      • “Spot Rehabilitation Property” — residential single-family homes, residential buildings with up to four units, commercial properties under 10,000 sq ft, or mixed buildings under 10,000 sq ft, meeting vacancy/distress criteria (vacant ≥12 months, no active rehabilitation permit issued, municipal determination of distress).
      • “Spot Rehabilitation Project” — projects exclusively consisting of spot rehabilitation properties.
    • Replaces/updates Section 7A to allow corporations, insurers, banks, or spot blight sponsors to purchase/lease publicly acquired land for redevelopment under housing/redevelopment authorities, consistent with housing board approval.

Who is affected
- Municipalities, housing/redevelopment authorities, and public bodies (through expanded redevelopment definitions and tools).
- Community development corporations, qualifying nonprofits, and other “spot blight project sponsors” (explicitly enabled to acquire/rehabilitate small distressed properties).
- Owners of small vacant/deteriorated residential and small commercial properties (targets for rehabilitation).
- Taxpayers and state revenues to the extent the increased $10M→$30M figures operate as caps or program funding/credit limits in chapters 62 and 63.

Procedural status and timeline (as provided)
- Introduced in the Massachusetts Senate (filed 1/15/2025; docket no. 1075 / S.1942).
- Referred actions listed variously to Transportation, Revenue, and Energy & Natural Resources committees (metadata shows multiple referrals; there are inconsistencies in the log).
- Hearing scheduled (per record) for 10/28/2025, 1:00–5:00 PM (B-2).
- Note: the legislative-action timeline provided contains duplicated and contradictory entries; readers should verify current status on the official state legislative website.

Potential impacts and considerations
- Programmatic: clarifies and lowers barriers for small-scale neighborhood rehabilitation, potentially accelerating reuse of vacant homes and small commercial buildings.
- Fiscal: increasing statutory dollar figures from $10M to $30M could expand available program funding or the size of tax expenditures where those figures serve as caps — exact fiscal impact depends on the underlying programs in chapters 62 and 63.
- Implementation: municipalities must make formal determinations of distress to trigger spot rehabilitation eligibility; housing board approvals remain required for some transfers.

For authoritative details and current status, consult the Massachusetts Legislature’s official bill page for S.1942 and committee docket entries.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.