WeVote

Bill

Bill

S 4301

Increases monetary thresholds for grading of theft offenses.

2026-2027 Regular Session Introduced by Shirley Turner

The bill raises monetary thresholds for grading theft offenses, potentially increasing penalties and reclassifying theft into higher categories based on property value.

Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Law and Public Safety Committee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 4301

Summary of Bill: S 4301 (New Jersey, 222nd Legislature)

Purpose and intent

  • S 4301 seeks to increase monetary thresholds used to grade or categorize theft offenses under New Jersey law. By raising these thresholds, the bill aims to affect how theft offenses are classified, which can influence penalties, penalties ranges, and related enforcement or judicial handling.

Key provisions and changes

  • The bill proposes upward adjustments to the dollar amounts that determine the grading of theft offenses. In practical terms, offenses currently classified or graded at certain monetary levels would move to higher grades or categories if the value of property involved meets the new, higher thresholds.
  • The changes are designed to recalibrate the severity levels assigned to theft cases based on the value stolen, potentially impacting:
    • Degrees of theft (e.g., petty theft vs. grand theft classifications)
    • Associated penalties, sentencing ranges, and any mandatory minimums or fines tied to theft grade
    • Discretion or guidelines available to judges in imposing sentences
  • The bill does not appear to alter other elements of theft statutes (such as intent requirements, possession, or related charges) beyond the monetary grading thresholds.

Who/what would be affected

  • Individuals charged with or convicted of theft offenses, where the value of property involved falls within the affected monetary ranges.
  • Courts and prosecutors, which would apply the revised grading to cases based on the updated thresholds.
  • Law enforcement may experience indirect effects in case handling or charging decisions if the grading changes influence plea negotiations or charging choices.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • History: Introduced in the New Jersey Senate on May 18, 2026.
  • Current stage: Referred to the Senate Law and Public Safety Committee for consideration.
  • Sponsor: Co-sponsored by Senator Shirley Turner.
  • Absent additional amendments or action, the bill would progress through committee hearings, potential floor votes, and, if passed, move to the Assembly and then to the governor for signing (typical legislative path in New Jersey). Specific timelines would depend on committee schedules and legislative priorities.

Potential implications and considerations

  • Penalty effect: Higher thresholds could raise the minimum grade of theft offenses, potentially increasing penalties for some defendants.
  • Judicial discretion: Judges would apply the new grading scheme when reviewing theft cases, which could influence sentencing outcomes.
  • Policy considerations: The bill reflects a policy choice to align theft grading with updated economic conditions or policy preferences regarding proportionality of penalties to theft value.

Note: This summary is based on the bill’s stated objective to increase monetary thresholds for grading theft offenses and the provided action history. For precise language, exact threshold amounts, and the full range of affected offenses, consult the bill’s text and any amended versions filed during committee deliberations.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.