Increase Maximum Number of Transportation Planning Regions
HB 25-1046 would raise the cap on transportation planning regions, enabling more regional bodies and changing how local governments coordinate transport projects and funding.
HB 25-1046 would raise the cap on transportation planning regions, enabling more regional bodies and changing how local governments coordinate transport projects and funding.
HB 25-1046 — Increase Maximum Number of Transportation Planning Regions
Overview
- Bill number: HB 25-1046
- Title: Increase Maximum Number of Transportation Planning Regions
- Purpose (as inferred from title): The bill aims to increase the statutory maximum number of transportation planning regions in the state, potentially enabling the creation or reconfiguration of regional planning bodies responsible for coordinating transportation planning and related funding.
- Introduced: January 8, 2025
- Primary Sponsors: Chris Richardson and Rod Pelton
- Current status: Postponed Indefinitely by the House Committee on Transportation, Housing & Local Government
- Committee action date: January 28, 2025
- Legislative history note: The bill was introduced and assigned to the Transportation, Housing & Local Government committee, where it was subsequently postponed indefinitely. This typically means the bill will not advance in the current session unless revived by later action.
What the bill would change (provisions not included in the provided text)
- The provided materials do not include the full bill text or a detailed summary of provisions. Based on the title, the bill would alter the statutory cap on how many transportation planning regions may exist. If enacted, this could entail:
- Increasing the maximum number of regional planning bodies authorized for transportation planning and coordination.
- Possible changes to how regions are defined or subdivided.
- Implications for governance structures, representation on regional commissions, and coordination with state transportation agencies.
- Potential transitional provisions to address reorganizations, funding allocations, or overlapping authority during implementation.
- Specifics such as the exact new maximum, criteria for creating or redefining regions, funding formulas, or transition timelines are not available in the provided excerpt.
Impact and who would be affected
- Regional planning regions and regional planning commissions or authorities responsible for transportation planning.
- Local governments and municipalities that participate in or rely on regional planning processes.
- The state Department of Transportation or equivalent state agency overseeing regional planning and project prioritization.
- Stakeholders involved in funding, project selection, and performance metrics for transportation programs.
Procedural and timeline aspects
- Introduction and assignment: The bill was introduced on January 8, 2025, and assigned to the House Committee on Transportation, Housing & Local Government.
- Committee action: The committee postponed the bill indefinitely on January 28, 2025, effectively halting its progression in the current session unless revived.
- Next steps (if pursued): If sponsors seek to advance the measure, they could reintroduce or amend the bill, seek committee reconsideration, or pursue alternate legislation. Tracking the bill would require monitoring committee calendars and any subsequent actions.
Sponsorship
- Primary sponsors: Chris Richardson; Rod Pelton
Notes for readers
- For a precise understanding of what HB 25-1046 would change, including the exact new maximum number of regions and any accompanying provisions, the full bill text and fiscal notes would be necessary. Check the legislative tracking system or the sponsor’s office for updates, amendments, or reintroduction in the next session.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.