WeVote

Bill

Bill

H 3865

Income tax deduction

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Jordan Pace

SC-style tax changes: minors under 18 may deduct their earnings and are not required to file a state return, reducing tax and filing burdens (MA text also mixed in).

Referred to Committee on Ways and Means
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · H 3865

Summary — H 3865

Status snapshot
- Bill number: H 3865
- Title (as listed): Income tax deduction
- Introduced: January 30, 2025 (first read); additional filing/entry shown January 17, 2025 and February 27, 2025 in the legislative actions log
- Current referral: Committee on Ways and Means (also shows prior referral to Veterans and Federal Affairs)
- Hearing scheduled: July 22, 2025, 1:00–5:00 PM (A‑2)
- Related: HD 3418 (replaces)
- Note on materials provided: the bill text in the packet appears to combine sections from two different measures (a Massachusetts “reimbursing armed service members” proposal and a South Carolina income‑tax exemption for minors). The summary below describes both parts as presented; users should verify the official legislative text.

Purpose and intent
- Two different themes appear in the provided materials:
1. A Massachusetts bill titled “An Act relative to reimbursing armed service members” that amends local government employee benefit language in chapter 33.
2. A South Carolina‑style draft that would create an income‑tax deduction and a non‑filing rule for individuals under age 18.

Key provisions (as presented)

  1. Massachusetts provision (chapter 33 amendment)
  2. Amends Section 59 of chapter 33 by striking existing subsection (e) and replacing it with:
    • New subsection (e): “An employee of a county, city or town shall be entitled to the benefits and protections of this section or the benefits of the accepted earlier law.”
  3. Practical effect (based on text): clarifies that county, city, and town employees are entitled either to the benefits/protections of the cited section or to benefits under prior law that had been accepted—likely a technical clarification to ensure local government employees (including armed service members employed by municipalities/cities/counties) receive specified benefits or reimbursement protections. The precise benefits referenced depend on the broader Section 59 context.

  4. South Carolina‑style tax provisions (appears to be inserted)

  5. Amends Section 12‑6‑1140 to add a new deduction:

    • (15) amounts earned by an individual under the age of eighteen on January 1 of the income tax year.
  6. Adds Section 12‑6‑4915:

    • An individual under age 18 on January 1 of the income tax year is not required to file a state income tax return (notwithstanding the general filing requirement in 12‑6‑4910).
  7. Effective date: upon approval by the Governor (per the draft language).

  8. Practical effect: minors (under 18 on Jan 1) would have their earnings excluded/deductible for state income tax purposes and would not be required to file a state return, reducing compliance burdens and state tax liability for minors; potential state revenue impact depends on scale.

Who is affected
- If the Massachusetts portion is the operative text: county, city, and town employees in Massachusetts (including those who are armed service members employed by local governments) would be explicitly covered by the benefits/protections referenced in Section 59.
- If the South Carolina provisions are operative: residents of South Carolina under age 18 with earned income would be exempted from state filing requirements and would receive a deduction for their earnings, reducing their state tax liability and administrative burden.

Procedural/timing notes
- The file shows mixed procedural entries (introduced/read, referrals to both Veterans and Federal Affairs and Ways and Means, and a Senate concurrence). Because the packet appears to conflate two different state bills, confirm the official legislature website or clerk’s office for the authoritative current text, sponsors, and committee assignments.
- A committee hearing is scheduled for 07/22/2025 (A‑2); any movement or amendments would occur through that committee process.

Recommendation
- Verify which state’s bill text is the official H 3865 in the relevant legislative chamber (Massachusetts vs. South Carolina language conflict). Once the correct, finalized text is confirmed, a targeted analysis of fiscal impact, affected programs, and statutory cross‑references should be prepared.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.