WeVote

Bill

Bill

H 3065

Immunity from prosecution

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Todd Rutherford

Creates a mechanism for a Contractor’s Sales Tax Exempt Purchase Certificate to exempt rental equipment for tax-exempt projects, with vendor hold-harmless protection.

Referred to Committee on Judiciary
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · H 3065

Summary — H.3065 (filed as “An Act relative to contractor rental equipment”)

Status and procedural history
- Bill number: H.3065 (House Docket No. 3099) — introduced by Rep. Mark J. Cusack.
- Prefiled: 12/05/2024. Introduced and read first time in the House: 01/14/2025. Referred to Committee on Judiciary on 01/14/2025; later referred to the Committee on Revenue (02/27/2025). Senate concurred 02/27/2025. Hearing scheduled for 09/29/2025.
- Note: The provided materials include an unrelated South Carolina statutory text concerning immunity-from-prosecution appeals (see “Note on extraneous text” below).

Purpose and intent
- The bill establishes a specific sales/use tax exemption procedure for contractors and subcontractors renting construction vehicles, equipment, and certain rented tangible personal property (e.g., office trailers, storage containers, portable restrooms, vehicles) to be used on tax-exempt projects in Massachusetts. It clarifies documentation required to claim exemption at the time of rental and protects rental vendors who accept the certificate in good faith.

Key provisions
- Adds language to paragraph (f) of section 6 of chapter 64H (Mass. Gen. Laws) creating a “Contractor’s Sales Tax Exempt Purchase Certificate.”
- Required information on the certificate:
- Name of the exempt organization and exempt number (or alternatively the exempt entity’s ST‑2 form).
- Name of the purchasing contractor or subcontractor.
- Contract or subcontract date and estimated completion date (if no estimated completion is provided, the certificate is valid for up to 24 months from the contract date).
- Contractor’s signature and title.
- Location and description of the exempt project.
- Definitions provided:
- “Rental Vendor” — businesses renting equipment/tangible personal property in the state under rental agreements of 365 days or less or under open-ended agreements.
- “Purchaser” — a contractor or subcontractor renting equipment to be used on a tax-exempt project pursuant to the paragraph.
- “Contractor’s Sales Tax Exempt Purchase Certificate” — the exemption form containing the above information.
- “Good faith” — acceptance of a completed tax-exempt purchase certificate under this paragraph.
- Liability protection: A rental vendor that accepts a completed Contractor’s Sales Tax Exempt Purchase Certificate in good faith is held harmless from collection of the sales/use tax.

Who is affected
- Contractors and subcontractors who rent equipment for use on tax-exempt projects — they must provide the specified certificate at time of rental.
- Rental vendors — must accept and rely on the certificate in good faith; acceptance protects them from liability for sales/use tax collection.
- Exempt organizations (project owners) — their exempt status must be documented by exempt number or ST‑2 on the contractor’s certificate.
- Massachusetts Department of Revenue — responsible for issuing the certificate form and handling any administrative inquiries/enforcement.

Potential impacts
- Administrative: New documentation requirement at point of rental increases paperwork for contractors and rental vendors; DOR may need to provide a standardized certificate and guidance.
- Revenue: May reduce immediate sales/use tax collections by vendors when valid certificates are presented; fiscal impact depends on prevalence of exempt projects and compliance.
- Compliance/risk: The “held harmless” good-faith protection reduces vendor risk but places more burden on DOR and auditors to verify improper use of exemptions after the fact.

Note on extraneous text in provided materials
- The supplied document also contains a separate South Carolina draft statute (adding S.C. Code §16‑11‑460) that would make orders on motions for immunity from prosecution immediately appealable. That South Carolina provision is unrelated to Massachusetts H.3065 and appears to have been appended in error. It is not part of the Massachusetts bill summarized above.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.