WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 3117

IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT ACT

104th Regular Session Introduced by Andrew Chesney

SB 3117 would set state rules for immigration enforcement by Illinois agencies, potentially guiding inquiries, cooperation with federal authorities, and related duties.

Referred to Assignments
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 3117

Overview

SB 3117 (Illinois, 104th Session) is titled the Immigration Enforcement Act. Introduced by Sen. Andrew S. Chesney (co-sponsored by Andrew Chesney), the measure is in the early stages of the legislative process, having been filed and referred to Assignments on February 2, 2026. The bill’s stated purpose appears to address immigration enforcement authorities and related procedures within the state.

Primary purpose and intent

  • Establish rules and procedures for immigration enforcement activities within Illinois.
  • Create or designate state-level processes that govern interactions between state/local agencies and individuals based on immigration status.
  • Potentially outline compliance standards, reporting requirements, and limitations related to enforcement actions.

Note: The exact statutory language is not provided in the available action history, so the summary reflects typical components found in immigration-enforcement-related bills. If enacted, the bill would guide how state and local authorities engage with federal immigration matters, and under what circumstances enforcement actions may be pursued or restricted.

Key provisions and changes (as typically found in similar bills)

Given the absence of the full text, the following are commonly addressed elements in immigration-enforcement legislation and may appear in SB 3117:

  • Restrictions or permissions on local law enforcement regarding immigration-status inquiries, detentions, or transfers to federal authorities.
  • Provisions related to cooperation with federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or Secure Communities-like programs.
  • Protections for specific populations (e.g., undocumented immigrants) regarding civil rights, access to public services, or employment.
  • Mandatory or voluntary reporting requirements for schools, hospitals, or employers regarding immigration status.
  • Financial or resource implications for state agencies, including potential funding for enforcement activities or training.
  • Penalties or enforcement mechanisms for violations of the act by state or local officials.
  • Procedures for challenging or reviewing immigration enforcement actions at the state level.

Who would be affected

  • State and local law enforcement agencies operating in Illinois.
  • Municipalities and counties that implement or participate in immigration-enforcement activities.
  • Individuals in Illinois — particularly noncitizens or those perceived to be in the state illegally — who could be subject to detention, reporting, or inquiry actions under the act.
  • Public institutions (schools, hospitals) and employers may be impacted if the bill includes reporting or cooperation requirements.
  • State government agencies responsible for administrative processes connected to enforcement measures.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Status: Filed and referred to Assignments on February 2, 2026.
  • Next steps typically involve committee assignments, hearings, and amendments before any potential floor vote.
  • Timeline depends on committee consideration, political priorities, and amendments; no specific operative dates or enactment timelines are provided in the current information.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • If enacted with broad enforcement authority, the bill could increase state or local involvement in immigration enforcement, with implications for civil liberties, fear and safety in immigrant communities, and workload for law enforcement.
  • Conversely, if the bill imposes restrictions or clarifies limitations on enforcement actions, it could reduce local authorities’ role in immigration matters and align practice with state protections for certain populations.
  • Fiscal implications could arise from training, enforcement activities, or compliance costs for agencies and institutions.

For readers seeking a deeper understanding, the full text, committee discussions, and fiscal notes (if any) will clarify the bill’s exact provisions, definitions, and practical effects.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.