WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 1706

Immigration - As introduced, creates a Class A misdemeanor for a person who is unlawfully present in the United States to operate a commercial motor vehicle in this state; requires the law enforcement agency of an officer who arrests a person who is unlawfully present in the United States to operate a commercial motor vehicle in this state to ensure that federal immigration authorities are notified; creates related civil actions that may be pursued by the attorney general and reporter or by a qui tam plaintiff. - Amends TCA Title 55, Chapter 50.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Jason Zachary

Makes undocumented immigrants operating commercial vehicles in Tennessee commit Class A misdemeanor, requires ICE notification, and enables civil suits by AG or private citizens against violators.

H. Placed on Regular Calendar for 4/20/2026
#immigration
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 1706

Legislative bill overview

HB 1706 would make it a Class A misdemeanor for undocumented immigrants to operate commercial motor vehicles in Tennessee and require law enforcement to notify federal immigration authorities when such violations occur. The bill also enables civil lawsuits to be filed by the Attorney General, district attorneys, or private citizens (qui tam plaintiffs) against violators.

Why is this important

Commercial motor vehicle operation directly affects public safety and interstate commerce, making licensing and operator eligibility significant regulatory matters. The bill creates new criminal penalties and civil enforcement mechanisms that would substantially increase consequences for undocumented individuals and expand state-level immigration enforcement coordination with federal authorities.

Potential points of contention

  • Commerce and licensing authority: Questions about whether states can restrict commercial licensing based on immigration status versus federal jurisdiction over immigration and interstate commerce
  • Qui tam provisions: The private lawsuit mechanism could incentivize litigation that critics argue shifts immigration enforcement to individual citizens rather than government agencies
  • Public safety efficacy: Debate over whether criminal penalties versus administrative licensing restrictions more effectively address safety concerns and whether notification mandates adequately serve their stated purpose
  • Implementation costs: Law enforcement training, federal coordination systems, and civil litigation expenses would require fiscal resources and interagency cooperation

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.