WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 5048

Hydropower Licensing Affordability Act

119th Congress Introduced by Steve Daines and 2 co-sponsors

The bill would require hydropower license conditions, including reserved lands and fishways, to be reasonably tailored to mitigate the project’s direct adverse effects.

Introduced in Senate
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 5048

Overview

Hydropower Licensing Affordability Act (S. 5048, 119th Congress)

  • Purpose: To amend the Federal Power Act to modernize the hydropower licensing process and help ensure that licensing requirements and conditions are aligned with affordability and reasonable mitigation standards.
  • Lead sponsors: Sen. Dan Daines (primary), with Senate co-sponsors Sen. Jim Risch and Sen. Lisa Murkowski.
  • Status: Introduced July 21, 2026; referred to the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Main purpose and intent

  • Modernize the statutory framework governing hydropower licensing under the Federal Power Act.
  • Ensure that license conditions and mitigation requirements are reasonably tailored to avoid undue economic burden while addressing environmental and resource concerns.
  • Specifically seek to clarify and adjust scopes related to federal reservation license conditions and prescribed fishways to incorporate reasonable mitigation effects.

Key provisions and changes

  1. Section 2 – Proper scope of Federal Reservation license conditions

    • Amends Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 797(e)).
    • Changes the first proviso to insert language requiring that federally reserved license conditions be applied “to reasonably mitigate the direct adverse effect” of the applicable project on the reservation, so as to provide mitigation when deemed necessary.
    • Effect: Signals a shift toward ensuring that mitigation requirements for reserved lands (e.g., tribal or other federal reservations) are connected to reasonable mitigation of direct adverse effects, potentially narrowing or clarifying the scope of conditions tied to reservation lands.

  2. Section 3 – Proper scope of prescribed fishways

    • Amends Section 18 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 811).
    • Adds language in the first sentence to include consideration of reasonably mitigating the direct adverse effects of the project on fish populations within the applicable river system.
    • Effect: Requires that prescribed fishways be evaluated or designed with a consideration of mitigating direct adverse impacts on fish populations, aligning fish passage requirements with practical mitigation outcomes.

Who/what is affected

  • Hydropower projects under the Federal Power Act that require licensing and conditions, particularly:
    • Projects with federally reserved lands or rights (relevant to Section 4(e) conditions).
    • Projects subject to fishway prescription under Section 18 (fish passage and related mitigation).
  • Federal agencies involved in licensing and environmental review (e.g., the Department of Energy, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as the licensing body in practice, and potentially land management or tribal authorities in relation to reservations).
  • Stakeholders include hydropower developers, tribal nations or other entities with reservation rights, environmental groups, and communities affected by project operations and mitigation requirements.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • The bill was introduced and referred to the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources on July 21, 2026.
  • There are no named dates for reporting or floor action in the text provided; typical legislative progression involves committee consideration, potential amendments, and sequential floor votes in the Senate, and later House consideration if passed.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Affordability and feasibility: By tying reservation and fishway conditions more explicitly to reasonable mitigation, the bill aims to ensure licensing conditions are economically and practically manageable while still addressing environmental and cultural resource concerns.
  • Environmental accuracy: By mandating mitigation of direct adverse effects on fish populations and reservation resources, the bill emphasizes direct effects rather than indirect or speculative impacts.
  • Regulatory clarity: The amendments provide clearer standards for license conditions, which could affect how terms are negotiated between developers, regulators, and resource holders.

If you’d like, I can compare these proposed changes to the current statutory language or provide a concise one-page briefing for policymakers.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.