WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 294

Highways, Roads and Bridges - As introduced, authorizes surveillance cameras to be installed on federal interstate highways and operated by a state entity to aid in the investigation and prevention of terrorism and state criminal offenses other than traffic violations; authorizes surveillance cameras to be installed on public roads and highways other than federal interstate highways and operated by local law enforcement agencies to aid in the investigation and prevention of terrorism and state criminal offenses other than traffic violations. - Amends TCA Section 55-8-198.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by John Clemmons

Authorizes state and local law enforcement to install surveillance cameras on Tennessee highways and public roads for terrorism and serious crime investigations, excluding traffic enforcement.

P2C, ref. to Transportation Committee
#highways #roadsandbridges
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 294

Legislative bill overview

HB 294 would authorize the installation of surveillance cameras on Tennessee's interstate highways (operated by state entities) and other public roads (operated by local law enforcement) to investigate and prevent terrorism and serious state crimes, explicitly excluding traffic enforcement purposes. The bill amends Tennessee's traffic surveillance laws to enable this expanded monitoring infrastructure.

Why is this important

This legislation directly impacts public privacy on roadways while potentially enhancing law enforcement's investigative capabilities for serious crimes. The scope of surveillance—covering both interstates and local roads statewide—could affect millions of daily commuters and raise questions about data storage, access, and mission creep from its stated purposes.

Potential points of contention

  • Privacy concerns: Extensive surveillance camera networks on public roads may be viewed as disproportionate monitoring of law-abiding citizens, raising Fourth Amendment questions about reasonable expectation of privacy
  • Scope and oversight: The bill doesn't specify data retention periods, access controls, or oversight mechanisms—creating potential for unauthorized use beyond terrorism/serious crimes
  • Local government burden: Requiring local law enforcement to operate and maintain cameras could strain budgets and resources, particularly in smaller municipalities
  • Traffic enforcement exclusion: While excluding traffic use is stated, enforcement of this limitation and preventing surveillance mission creep remains uncertain

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.