WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 1881

Health records cost provisions modifications

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Bill Lieske and 1 co-sponsor

Minnesota bill adjusts patient health records copying fees and transmission procedures to modify provider costs and patient access barriers.

Referred to Health and Human Services
#datapracticesandprivacy #healthandhealthdepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 1881

Legislative bill overview

SF 1881 modifies existing provisions governing the costs that healthcare providers can charge patients for copying and transmitting their health records. The bill adjusts fees, timelines, or procedural requirements related to how patients access their medical documentation under Minnesota health records law.

Why is this important

Health records access directly affects patients' ability to switch providers, seek second opinions, and maintain control over their medical information. Fee structures for records copies can create financial barriers to accessing one's own health data, making this a practical healthcare consumer protection issue with meaningful real-world consequences for patient autonomy and continuity of care.

Potential points of contention

  • Cost burden allocation: Disputes over whether providers should bear more costs for records transmission versus passing expenses to patients requesting copies
  • Electronic vs. paper records: Different fee structures or timelines for digital versus physical records may advantage certain patient groups or provider types
  • Compliance complexity: Changes to existing rules could create administrative burdens or compliance costs for healthcare facilities, potentially affecting smaller practices differently than large health systems

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.