WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 4609

Health plans required to cover infertility treatment and standard fertility preservation services, medical assistance and MinnesotaCare required to cover infertility treatment and standard fertility preservation services, and money appropriated.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Patty Acomb and 14 co-sponsors

Minnesota health plans and MA/MinnesotaCare would be required to cover infertility treatment and standard fertility preservation services.

Authors added Elkins and Berg
#appropriations #childrenandminors #healthandhealthdepartment #insurance-health
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 4609

Summary: HF 4609 (2025-2026) – Health plans and coverage for infertility treatment and standard fertility preservation; MA and MinnesotaCare requirements; and appropriation

Purpose and intent

HF 4609 proposes to require health plans offered or administered in Minnesota, as well as public assistance programs (Medical Assistance and MinnesotaCare), to cover infertility treatment and standard fertility preservation services. The bill appears to set forth mandated coverage across private plans and state-funded programs to ensure access to infertility care and preservation options, with funding provisions through state appropriations.

Key provisions

  • Coverage obligation for health plans

    • Mandates private health plans (likely including plans sold through the individual and small group markets and possibly large group plans, depending on the bill’s final language) to cover infertility treatment.
    • Requires coverage for standard fertility preservation services, which typically include procedures to preserve eggs, sperm, or embryos in the context of medical treatments or other fertility-related needs.

  • Public programs: MA and MinnesotaCare

    • Medical Assistance (MA) and MinnesotaCare must provide coverage for infertility treatment.
    • Coverage would extend to standard fertility preservation services under these programs, aligning state-supported care with private-plan requirements.

  • Definitions and scope

    • The bill would define terms such as “infertility treatment” and “standard fertility preservation services,” potentially listing encompassed procedures (e.g., medications for ovulation induction, intrauterine insemination, in vitro fertilization, and cryopreservation services).
    • The scope may specify which stages of infertility treatment are covered (e.g., initial evaluation, diagnostic testing, and subsequent treatment cycles).

  • Cost-sharing and plan design considerations

    • The bill may address copays, deductibles, and annual or lifetime limits, though exact language would determine whether cost-sharing is restricted or aligned with other comparable medical services.
    • Possible alignment with existing Minnesota preventive or essential health benefits standards to ensure comparable coverage across plan types.

  • Implementation and appropriations

    • The title indicates money appropriated, suggesting the bill includes or accompanies an appropriation to support the program expansion or to offset costs related to coverage mandates.
    • Timeline provisions would indicate when coverage must begin (e.g., upon enactment or a specified future date) and any phase-in periods.

Who is affected

  • Individuals with infertility needs seeking treatment under private health insurance plans in Minnesota.
  • Recipients of Medical Assistance (MA) and MinnesotaCare who require infertility treatment and stability-preserving options.
  • Plan sponsors and insurers offering health plans in Minnesota, which would need to modify coverage to comply with the mandate.
  • Healthcare providers delivering infertility care and fertility preservation services, who may experience increased demand and administrative requirements.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduced and referred: HF 4609 was introduced and referred to the Health Finance and Policy committee in March 2026.
  • Author and sponsor updates: Additional authors and co-sponsors added through April 2026, indicating broad bipartisan or cross-party support among legislators.
  • Action history indicates ongoing committee consideration, potential amendments, and eventual floor votes and enactment depending on committee outcomes and legislative process.

Notes and considerations

  • The exact scope of “infertility treatment” and “standard fertility preservation services” will be defined in the bill’s text; this can influence the breadth of coverage (e.g., including or excluding experimental procedures, sequential treatment cycles, or related services).
  • The level and mechanism of the appropriations (one-time vs. ongoing funding, general fund vs. special appropriations) will affect long-term fiscal impact and state budget planning.
  • Administrative and negotiation aspects with insurers will shape implementation timelines and any transition rules for existing plans.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to include anticipated fiscal impact estimates, a comparison with existing Minnesota coverage practices, or a line-by-line outline once the final bill text is available.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.