WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 754

Health Care - As introduced, requires gender clinics accepting funds from this state to perform gender transition procedures to also perform detransition procedures; requires insurance entities providing coverage of gender transition procedures to also cover detransition procedures; requires certain gender clinics and insurance entities to report information regarding detransition procedures to the department of health. - Amends TCA Title 1; Title 4; Title 33; Title 56; Title 63; Title 68 and Title 71.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Jeremy Faison

Tennessee bill requires state-funded gender clinics and insurers covering transition procedures to also provide detransition coverage and file utilization reports to state health department.

H. concurred in S. am. no. 2 and no. 4 Ayes 73, Nays 23 PNV 1
#healthcare
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 754

Legislative bill overview

HB 754 mandates that state-funded gender clinics and insurance plans covering gender transition procedures must also provide coverage and services for detransition procedures. The bill additionally requires these entities to report data on detransition procedures to the Tennessee Department of Health across multiple state codes governing healthcare, insurance, and public health.

Why is this important

This bill addresses a gap in healthcare services and insurance coverage by creating parity between transition and detransition options. It also establishes new reporting requirements that would generate data on detransition procedure utilization in Tennessee, which currently lacks standardized collection mechanisms.

Potential points of contention

  • Medical necessity standards: Disagreement over whether detransition procedures should be treated as equally medically necessary as transition procedures, or whether clinical criteria should differ
  • Insurance cost implications: Concerns about whether mandatory coverage expansion increases premiums or strains insurance markets, versus arguments that coverage parity prevents discriminatory practices
  • Reporting burden and privacy: Questions about whether mandatory reporting requirements create administrative costs, potential privacy concerns, and whether data collection focuses on appropriate clinical outcomes versus creating surveillance mechanisms
  • Scope and access: Debate over whether the requirement applies appropriately to all clinic types and funding sources, and whether it ensures actual availability or merely mandates coverage on paper

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.