WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 6465

HALT Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced by John Garamendi and 1 co-sponsor

HALT Act pushes accelerated, verifiable, global talks to reduce/eliminate nuclear weapons, strengthens verification, stockpile stewardship, and U.S. leadership in arms control.

Introduced in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 6465

Summary of H.R. 6465 — HALT Act of 2025

Purpose and Intent

  • Official Title: Hastening Arms Limitations Talks Act of 2025 (HALT Act).
  • Purpose: To reduce and eliminate threats posed by nuclear weapons to the United States and to advance international arms control and reduction efforts.
  • Context: The bill frames nuclear weapons and testing as persistent existential threats and positions renewed, verifiable arms control as a key national-security priority.

Key Provisions (as reflected in the introduced text)

  • The bill emphasizes a policy goal of accelerating and strengthening international talks and measures to limit, reduce, and eventually eliminate nuclear weapons.
  • It highlights the importance of verifiable arms control and nonproliferation mechanisms, referencing bilateral and multilateral treaties (e.g., the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, CTBT verification structures) as part of the framework for ongoing risk reduction.
  • The introduction outlines support for robust stockpile stewardship and verification capacities to maintain safety, security, and effectiveness of the U.S. nuclear deterrent without reliance on nuclear testing.
  • It cites historical and recent arms-control milestones and principles (e.g., mutual and verifiable reductions, leadership on global nonproliferation efforts) as the basis for renewed negotiations and action.
  • While the full text of concrete new requirements is not provided in the excerpt, the emphasis is on advancing negotiations, strengthening verification regimes (including those associated with CTBT-related structures), and reinforcing U.S. commitment to strategic stability through arms-control mechanisms.

Who/What Would Be Affected

  • U.S. Executive Branch entities involved in nuclear policy, arms control, verification, and deterrence (e.g., Department of Defense, Department of Energy, and related agencies) would be central to implementing any HALT Act directives.
  • The bill would influence U.S. engagement with international partners and allies on arms-control talks, nonproliferation initiatives, and treaty compliance/verifications.
  • Congress, particularly the Armed Services Committee and the Foreign Affairs Committee, would oversee or shape the legislation’s implementation and related policy actions.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduced: December 4, 2025.
  • Status: Introduced in the House and referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for consideration of provisions within their jurisdiction. The timeline for action is pending committee consideration and subsequent floor vote.
  • No final passage timeline is provided in the introductory text; the typical path would involve committee markup, potential amendments, and floor debate in the House, followed by consideration by the Senate.

Notes

  • The bill’s text here emphasizes findings about the existential threat of nuclear weapons, long-standing calls for disarmament, and the value of verifiable reductions, setting the stage for forthcoming provisions that would advance negotiations and stabilization measures.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.