Bill
HR 3343
Greenlighting Growth Act
Summary of H.R. 3343: Greenlighting Growth Act OverviewThe Greenlighting Growth Act is a bill introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on May 13, 2025. The bill aims to spur
Bill
HR 3343
Summary of H.R. 3343: Greenlighting Growth Act OverviewThe Greenlighting Growth Act is a bill introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on May 13, 2025. The bill aims to spur
The Greenlighting Growth Act is a bill introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on May 13, 2025. The bill aims to spur economic growth and development by streamlining the federal environmental review and permitting process for major infrastructure projects.
The bill would make the following key changes:
Expedited Environmental Review Process: The legislation would set strict deadlines for federal agencies to complete environmental impact statements and reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Agencies would be required to complete NEPA reviews within 1 year for most projects.
Consolidated Permitting: The bill would create a "One Federal Decision" policy, requiring federal agencies to work together to issue a single record of decision for major infrastructure projects. This would consolidate the often-lengthy and overlapping permitting process.
Expanded Categorical Exclusions: The legislation would expand the types of projects that qualify for categorical exclusions from NEPA review, including certain road maintenance, broadband deployment, and renewable energy projects.
Judicial Review Limits: The bill would place new restrictions on the judicial review of agency decisions, including a 150-day statute of limitations for filing legal challenges.
The Greenlighting Growth Act is intended to accelerate the development of major infrastructure, energy, and other projects in the United States. Supporters argue it will boost economic growth, create jobs, and improve the country's aging infrastructure.
However, critics contend the bill undermines important environmental protections and public review processes. They argue the expedited timelines and reduced oversight could lead to negative environmental and community impacts that are not adequately considered.
The bill has been received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Further action and a potential vote in the full Senate will depend on the committee's review and recommendations.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.