Bill
LC 3049
Summary of LC 3049: Generally Revise Trapping Laws Purpose and IntentLC 3049 is a draft bill that proposes to make various changes to Montana's laws regulating the use of traps for
LC 3049 is a draft bill that proposes to make various changes to Montana's laws regulating the use of traps for hunting and wildlife management. The primary goal of the legislation is to update and strengthen regulations around trapping practices in the state.
The major components of LC 3049 include:
Expanded Trap Identification Requirements: The bill would mandate that all traps used in Montana be clearly labeled with the trapper's name, address, and a unique identification number. This is intended to improve accountability and enforcement.
Increased Trap Checking Frequency: LC 3049 would require trappers to check their traps at least once every 24 hours, increased from the current 72-hour requirement. This aims to reduce the suffering of trapped animals.
Restrictions on Trapping Near Recreational Areas: The legislation proposes banning trapping within 0.5 miles of any designated hiking trail, campground, or other recreational site on public lands. This is meant to enhance public safety and reduce conflicts between trappers and other outdoor enthusiasts.
Prohibitions on Certain Trap Types: The bill would ban the use of body-gripping traps (e.g. conibear traps) as well as any trap larger than 7 inches in width. Proponents argue these types of traps are inhumane and pose risks to non-target wildlife.
LC 3049 would primarily impact licensed trappers in Montana, who would need to adjust their practices to comply with the new requirements. Wildlife management agencies and outdoor recreation groups may also be affected, as the legislation aims to balance trapping activities with public access and safety concerns.
As a draft bill, LC 3049 has not yet been formally introduced in the Montana Legislature. The bill was developed through the legislature's drafting process, but died before reaching consideration by any legislative committees. If reintroduced in a future session, the bill would need to go through the standard legislative process of committee hearings, floor votes, and potential reconciliation between the House and Senate versions.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
