WeVote

Bill

Bill

LC 3688

Generally revise military higher education act

2025 Regular Session

Broad rewrite of the military higher education act would reshape ROTC, service academies, and DoD education programs, but the draft died in process.

(LC) Draft Died in Process
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · LC 3688

Summary of LC 3688 — Generally revise military higher education act

Overview
- Bill number: LC 3688
- Title: Generally revise military higher education act
- Subject: Military Affairs, Schools and Education
- Status: Draft; Died in Process
- Introduced: December 17, 2024
- Legislative Actions:
- 2024-12-17: Drafter Assigned
- 2025-01-20: Draft On Hold
- 2025-05-23: Draft Died in Process

What the bill aims to do (based on title)
- The bill’s title indicates an intention to broadly revise the statutory framework governing military higher education. However, the specific aims, policy changes, and operative provisions would be contained in the bill’s text, which has not been provided in the information available here. As a result, the precise changes to programs, funding, governance, or oversight cannot be enumerated from the title alone.

Key provisions (not available from provided text)
- No substantive provisions are listed in the information you supplied.
- Typical elements in bills that “generally revise” an act might include:
- Governance and oversight of military higher education programs (e.g., Navy/Army/Air Force ROTC, service academies, or DoD education initiatives).
- Funding authorities, tuition assistance, stipends, or scholarships.
- Accreditation, quality standards, and reporting requirements.
- Eligibility, admissions, and student support services.
- Accountability mechanisms and performance metrics.
- Because the actual text is not provided, none of these provisions can be confirmed for LC 3688.

Potential impact and stakeholders (if enacted)
- Affects:
- Military personnel pursuing higher education (ROTC programs, service academy students, and other military education initiatives).
- Universities and colleges partnering with military programs.
- Branch-specific education offices and the Department of Defense.
- Policymakers and oversight bodies responsible for education funding and program effectiveness.
- Possible outcomes (hypothetical, contingent on enacted provisions):
- Changes in funding allocations or eligibility rules for educational benefits.
- Revisions to program governance, reporting requirements, or accreditation standards.
- Adjustments to partnerships between the military and civilian higher education institutions.

Procedural notes and timeline
- Status indicates the bill text did not advance and the draft ultimately died in the process during the 2025 session.
- Earlier actions show a drawn-out drafting phase (Drafter Assigned), followed by on-hold status before final disposition as “Died in Process.”
- If there is interest in revitalizing or revising this proposal, a new bill would typically need to be introduced in a future legislative session with new procedural steps.

Next steps for a fuller summary
- To provide a comprehensive, provision-by-provision summary, please share the bill text, committee analysis, or fiscal notes. With the actual language, I can extract specific changes, quantify impacts, and identify affected programs and timelines.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.