WeVote
Log In

Bill

MN

Bill

SB 66

Generally revise definitions relating to the judiciary

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Mark Noland

Montana bill to revise judicial system definitions failed to advance past second reading and died in the 2025 legislative session.

(S) Died in Process
#courts #judgesandjustices
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 66

Legislative bill overview

SB 66 sought to revise and update definitions related to Montana's judicial system. The bill did not advance through the legislative process, failing to pass second reading and ultimately dying in committee before the general bill transmittal deadline.

Why is this important

Definitional changes in judicial legislation can affect how courts operate, who qualifies for certain positions, and how legal procedures are interpreted and applied. Clear judicial definitions are foundational to consistent court functioning across the state.

Potential points of contention

  • The bill's specific proposed definitions were not detailed in available materials, making it unclear what changes prompted the failed second reading vote
  • Legislative process failures (missed deadlines, failed motion votes) suggest either insufficient support or procedural disagreement among senators
  • Without knowing the actual definitional revisions proposed, it's difficult to assess whether opposition stemmed from substantive policy concerns or technical/drafting issues

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.