WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

LC 1929

Generally revise criminal laws, including threats and/or cyberstalking of public officials

2025 Regular Session

Proposed LC 1929 would revise criminal laws to better deter threats and cyberstalking of public officials, defining terms and penalties; the draft died in process.

(LC) Draft Died in Process
#crimes
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · LC 1929

Summary: LC 1929 – Generally revise criminal laws, including threats and/or cyberstalking of public officials

Bill at a glance

  • Bill number: LC 1929
  • Title: Generally revise criminal laws, including threats and/or cyberstalking of public officials
  • Status: Draft died in process (LC)
  • Introduced: November 23, 2024
  • Classification/Subject: Crimes

Purpose and intent

  • The bill was designed to generally revise the state’s criminal laws, with particular emphasis on provisions related to threats and cyberstalking directed at public officials.
  • Based on the title, the reform aimed to clarify, broaden, or harmonize criminal statutes to address conduct that threatens or cyberstalks public officials, potentially including new definitions, offenses, or penalties related to such conduct.

Key provisions (as suggested by the title)

  • While the actual text is not provided, the bill’s scope likely would have included:
    • Revisions to existing criminal statutes to cover threats and cyberstalking more comprehensively.
    • Clear definitions of “threat” and “cyberstalking” in the context of actions against public officials.
    • Penalties or enhanced penalties for crimes targeting public officials, potentially including electronic communications, online harassment, or stalking behaviors.
    • Provisions to aid enforcement, such as reporting requirements, evidence standards, or cross-agency cooperation.
    • Consistency with existing laws governing threats to public officials and cyberharassment.
  • Note: Specific language, thresholds, exceptions, and penalty amounts are not provided in the available information.

Who would be affected

  • Primary targets: Individuals engaging in threats or cyberstalking of public officials.
  • Public officials: Those protected under the revised provisions (e.g., elected or appointed government officials, and possibly certain officials at the state or local level).
  • Law enforcement and prosecutors: Entities responsible for enforcing the revised statute and pursuing prosecutions.
  • General public: Indirectly affected through changes in definitions, enforcement practices, and potential impact on free speech considerations and cyberconduct norms.

Procedural timeline and status

  • Introduced: November 23, 2024 (Drafter Assigned on the same date in the record)
  • Status history:
    • 2024-11-23: Drafter Assigned
    • 2025-05-27: Draft Died in Process
  • Current status: The draft did not progress toward enactment and is considered closed/died in process. There is no indication of subsequent reintroduction within the provided record.

Potential impact and considerations

  • If enacted, the bill could have clarified and potentially expanded protections for public officials from threats and cyberstalking, potentially affecting both offenders and enforcement practices.
  • Key policy considerations would include balancing public safety and the right to free expression, ensuring precise definitions to avoid overbreadth, and addressing technological aspects of cyberstalking.
  • With the draft now closed, any future effort would require reintroduction and passage through the standard legislative process.

If you have access to the bill text or committee reports, I can provide a more detailed section-by-section analysis of the proposed provisions and specific penalties.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.