WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

LC 3778

Generally revise artificial intelligence laws

2025 Regular Session

Aims to overhaul AI laws with risk-based rules, transparency, and accountability to protect consumers, but the draft died and no law was enacted.

(LC) Draft Died in Process
#informationtechnology(seealso:communications)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · LC 3778

Summary of LC 3778 — Generally revise artificial intelligence laws

Quick Facts

  • Bill Number: LC 3778
  • Title: Generally revise artificial intelligence laws
  • Status: Draft Died in Process (inactive)
  • Introduced: December 14, 2024
  • Classification: bill
  • Subject: Information Technology (see also: Communications)

What the bill aims to do (purpose and intent)

The bill’s title indicates an effort to overhaul or modernize the state's artificial intelligence (AI) laws. While the specific text is not provided in the record, a bill with this scope typically seeks to:
- Update definitions related to AI and automated decision systems.
- Establish a risk-based framework for regulating AI technologies.
- Create or adjust transparency, accountability, and safety requirements for AI systems.
- Align AI governance with privacy, consumer protection, and cybersecurity standards.
- Clarify enforcement authority, penalties, and compliance timelines.

Because the actual provisions are not included in the available data, the above describes common objectives associated with broad AI-law revisions.

Key provisions (typical areas such a bill might cover)

Note: The following is an indicative list based on the bill’s title and subject area. The exact text for LC 3778 is not provided here.

  • Definitions and scope: Clear definitions for terms like “artificial intelligence,” “algorithmic decision-making,” and “high-risk AI.”
  • Risk-based regulation: Categorization of AI systems by risk level (e.g., low, moderate, high-risk) with corresponding requirements.
  • Transparency and disclosure: Requirements for disclosures to users, explanations of automated decisions, or labeling of AI-generated content.
  • Data privacy and security: Standards for data collection, storage, processing, and breach notification related to AI systems.
  • Accountability and governance: Responsibilities for developers, operators, and organizations deploying AI; oversight mechanisms.
  • Licensing/registration: Potential licensing or registration for certain high-risk or large-scale AI systems.
  • Compliance and enforcement: Regulatory authority, compliance audits, penalties, and remedies for violations.
  • Interoperability and standards: Alignment with existing IT, privacy, and consumer protection laws; adoption of or reference to standards.
  • Effective date and sunset provisions: Timelines for implementation and possible sunset/review clauses.

Who would be affected

  • AI developers, vendors, and operators deploying AI systems within the jurisdiction.
  • Businesses and public-sector entities that deploy or rely on AI for operations, customer interactions, or decision-making.
  • Consumers and end-users who interact with AI-driven services or experiences.
  • Regulatory bodies and law enforcement responsible for enforcing AI-related rules and handling complaints.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • 2024-12-14: Drafter Assigned — the bill was first assigned to a drafter for drafting language.
  • 2025-01-07: Draft On Hold — the draft entered a hold status, delaying immediate progress.
  • 2025-05-23: Draft Died in Process — the draft did not advance and the measure did not become law.

Potential impact if enacted (contextual)

  • Strengthened governance over AI technologies, with potential improvements in safety, accountability, and consumer protections.
  • Possible compliance costs for businesses to meet new requirements (documentation, audits, labeling, licensing).
  • Greater clarity for stakeholders about permissible uses of AI and the handling of data.
  • Implications for innovation, depending on how stringent or flexible the provisions are and how quickly compliance can be achieved.

Next steps / monitoring

  • At present, the bill is inactive with no enacted provisions. If revived in the future, it would likely proceed through committee hearings, amendments, and floor debates.
  • Stakeholders should monitor for revised versions or related AI-legislation that may address definitions, risk categories, and enforcement more concretely.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to a specific jurisdiction or compare it to AI regulations in other states/countries for broader context.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.