WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

LC 1677

Generally revise artificial intelligence laws

2025 Regular Session

LC 1677 aims to broadly revise AI laws; text never advanced and died in drafting. If revived, it would reshape AI rules for developers, vendors, government, and users.

(LC) Draft Died in Process
#informationtechnology
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · LC 1677

Summary of LC 1677 – Generally revise artificial intelligence laws

Overview

  • Bill Number: LC 1677
  • Title: Generally revise artificial intelligence laws
  • Subject: Information Technology (also related to Communications)
  • Purpose (as inferred from title): A broad effort to revise the state’s artificial intelligence laws and regulatory framework.
  • Status: Draft died in process (LC). Drafts were assigned and on hold at various points in late 2024, with the most recent status showing Died in Process on 2025-05-26.
  • Introduction date: November 19, 2024

Current Status and Timeline

  • 2024-11-19: Drafter Assigned; Draft On Hold
  • 2024-11-19: Draft On Hold
  • 2024-11-19: Introduced
  • 2025-05-26: Draft Died in Process
  • Interpretation: The bill was introduced and underwent initial drafting steps but did not advance through the legislative process and ultimately died in the drafting stage. No final passage or enacted provisions are available.

Key Provisions and Changes (Based on Available Information)

  • Specific provisions are not provided in the available metadata. The bill’s title indicates a broad revision of artificial intelligence laws, but the text outlining exact changes, definitions, regulatory standards, or affected statutes is not included here.
  • As a result, there are no explicit provisions, regulatory requirements, or timelines to summarize beyond the general intent to revise AI laws.

Potential Impact (If Enacted)

  • Regulated Scope: Likely to affect entities involved in AI development, deployment, or use within the jurisdiction, including developers, vendors, employers, and government programs utilizing AI.
  • Regulatory Framework: Would potentially modify how AI is regulated, including definitions, risk categories, compliance obligations, enforcement mechanisms, and reporting requirements.
  • Consumer and Privacy Considerations: Could address transparency, accountability, safety standards, or privacy protections related to AI systems.
  • Interplay with IT/Communications Law: May align or modify existing information technology and communications statutory provisions to accommodate AI-specific rules.

Note: Because the actual text is not provided, the above potential impacts are general expectations tied to a broad AI regulatory revision and do not reflect confirmed provisions.

Affected Parties

  • AI developers and vendors operating in the state
  • Businesses deploying AI systems
  • Public sector agencies using or procuring AI
  • Consumers and end-users of AI-enabled services

Next Steps / What to Watch

  • If interested, monitor for any reintroduction or new drafts of LC 1677 or similar AI legislation.
  • Check for updated official summaries or the bill’s text to review specific definitions, requirements, exemptions, penalties, and enforcement provisions if reintroduced.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.