WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 3179

General Fund; FY2026 appropriation to Town of Webb for infrastructure improvements to town buildings.

2025 Regular Session

Authorizes a FY2026 General Fund appropriation to Town of Webb for infrastructure improvements to town buildings; the bill died in committee.

Died In Committee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 3179

Summary of SB 3179 (2025)

Overview

  • Bill Number: SB 3179
  • Title: General Fund; FY2026 appropriation to Town of Webb for infrastructure improvements to town buildings
  • Status: Died In Committee
  • Introduced: February 25, 2025
  • Classification/Subject: Appropriations (General Fund)

What the bill would do

  • Authorizes an appropriation from the General Fund for fiscal year 2026 to the Town of Webb.
  • Purpose of the funding: infrastructure improvements to town buildings.
  • The bill would specify that the funds are dedicated to improving public infrastructure associated with town-owned buildings.

Fiscal impact

  • The bill would create a General Fund expenditure to the Town of Webb for infrastructure improvements.
  • Specific dollar amounts, matching requirements, or restrictions on use are not provided in the available summary.
  • As an appropriations bill, the funds would affect the state budget's General Fund balance for FY2026, and the town would receive funds for eligible improvement projects.

Beneficiaries and impact

  • Primary beneficiary: Town of Webb (local government) and its residents, through improved town buildings and related infrastructure.
  • Potential indirect benefits include enhanced public facilities, safety upgrades, and improved service delivery at town buildings.

Procedural history and status

  • Introduced: February 25, 2025
  • Feb 25, 2025: Referred to Appropriations
  • Feb 26, 2025: Died In Committee

Key provisions and limitations (as available)

  • The bill centers on a General Fund appropriation for FY2026 aimed specifically at infrastructure improvements to Town of Webb town buildings.
  • Details such as the exact funding amount, eligible projects, grant administration, reporting requirements, or conditions of use are not provided in the summary provided.

What happens next

  • Since the bill died in committee, it did not advance to a floor vote.
  • The measure could be reintroduced in a future session or amended and refiled for consideration by the legislature.

Why this matters (context)

  • If enacted, the bill would directly allocate state resources to a local government for capital improvements, aligning state support with local infrastructure needs. The absence of an enacted version means the town would not receive these funds unless a new bill is introduced and approved.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.