WeVote

Bill

Bill

HF 37

Free, fair, and equal elections provided; and constitutional amendment proposed.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Patty Acomb and 34 co-sponsors

HF 37 aims to guarantee free, fair, and equal elections in Minnesota and to place a constitutional amendment on protecting voting rights and election integrity.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Elections Finance and Government Operations
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 37

Summary of HF 37 (2025-2026) – Minnesota

Overview

HF 37 proposes to establish “free, fair, and equal elections” in Minnesota and includes a constitutional amendment related to the same topic. The bill was introduced on February 10, 2025, and referred to the Elections Finance and Government Operations committee. It has a broad roster of co-sponsors, indicating wide legislative support and an emphasis on voting rights and election integrity.

Purpose and Intent

  • The primary aim is to guarantee free, fair, and equal elections for Minnesota residents.
  • The bill additionally seeks to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot or into the Minnesota Constitution to protect or enforce these principles.

Key Provisions (Substantive Changes)

While the exact text of HF 37 is not provided in the summary, typical provisions for a bill with this title and structure may include:
- Establishing voters’ rights (e.g., non-discrimination, access to voting, protection against suppression).
- Rules or standards to ensure election administration is impartial and accessible.
- Requirements for election administration entities (state and local) to provide equal access to casting ballots, voting equipment, and information.
- Provisions addressing funding or resources for administering elections to prevent inequities.
- A constitutional amendment proposal to enshrine the principles of free, fair, and equal elections, potentially outlining:
- The right to vote and participate in elections.
- The obligation of the state to ensure access and integrity.
- Limitations on laws or practices that could restrict voting rights.

Note: The exact measures (e.g., mail-in voting access, early voting days, drop-box availability, voter ID provisions, redistricting standards, funding allocations, and enforcement mechanisms) would be specified in the bill’s text. The summary provided here reflects the bill’s stated goal and typical components of related legislation.

Who/What Would Be Affected

  • Voters: Guaranteed protections and access to elections, aiming to reduce barriers and prevent discrimination in voting.
  • Election Officials: State and local election administrators would implement standards and procedures to ensure free, fair, and equal elections.
  • Governmental Institutions: Possible constraints or directions on how elections are financed, managed, and overseen.
  • Constitution: If enacted, the proposed constitutional amendment would add formal protections for voting rights and election administration.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction and First Reading: February 10, 2025.
  • Referral: Elections Finance and Government Operations committee.
  • Next steps would typically include committee hearings, potential amendments, floor debates, and votes in the House, followed by considerations in the Senate (if applicable) and the potential path to a constitutional amendment (which may require a statutory passage and a subsequent voter ratification, depending on Minnesota constitutional procedures).

Additional Considerations

  • The bill is sponsored by a broad group of legislators, indicating cross-party or cross-district support for strengthening voting rights and election administration.
  • As a constitutional amendment proposal, passage would require the constitutional amendment process established by Minnesota law, which often includes a vote in the Legislature and, in most cases, voter approval in a general election.

If you’d like, I can pull the bill’s text (or a more detailed summary provided by the authors) to add specific provisions, such as exact voting rights protections, accessibility measures, funding levels, enforcement mechanisms, and the precise language of the proposed constitutional amendment.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.