WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 148

Expressing support for a federally owned transcontinental pipeline system that runs from the western coast of the Mexico-United States border to refineries located along the Gulf Coast of Texas and Louisiana.

89th Legislature, 2nd Called Session (2025) Introduced by Mark Dorazio

Non-binding resolution supporting a federally owned transcontinental pipeline from the Mexico border to Texas/Louisiana Gulf Coast refineries for oil transport and regional economic development.

Filed
#oil&gas(i0545) #resolutions--legislativepolicy(i0685)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 148

Legislative bill overview

HR 148 is a non-binding resolution expressing congressional support for a federally owned transcontinental pipeline system extending from the U.S.-Mexico border in the west to Gulf Coast refineries in Texas and Louisiana. The bill does not authorize funding or construction but signals legislative intent to support such infrastructure development.

Why is this important

Pipeline infrastructure affects energy security, oil refining capacity, and regional economic development. A federally owned system would represent significant government involvement in energy infrastructure, contrasting with current private-sector pipeline ownership. This proposal could influence future federal energy policy and infrastructure investment decisions.

Potential points of contention

  • Federal ownership vs. private sector: Questions whether federal ownership is more efficient or appropriate than private development, and potential constitutional/legal challenges to government-owned energy infrastructure
  • Environmental and land concerns: Transcontinental pipelines require extensive right-of-way across multiple states, triggering environmental reviews, indigenous land issues, and private property acquisition debates
  • Cost and fiscal responsibility: Federal ownership and construction would require substantial public funding; unclear how costs would be allocated and whether taxpayers should bear pipeline infrastructure expenses rather than private investors
  • Regulatory jurisdiction: Competing interests between state authority, federal authority, and existing regulatory frameworks (FERC, EPA) over pipeline siting and operation

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.