WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 1469

Expands "Daniel's Law" to prohibit disclosure of personal information concerning court administrators and deputy court administrators.

2026-2027 Regular Session Introduced by Joe Cryan

New Jersey bill expands privacy law to shield home addresses and personal details of court administrators and deputy court administrators from public disclosure.

Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Judiciary Committee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 1469

Legislative bill overview

S 1469 expands New Jersey's "Daniel's Law" to include court administrators and deputy court administrators under privacy protections that previously applied to judges and other court personnel. The bill prohibits the disclosure of personal information—such as home addresses, phone numbers, and family details—about these administrative officials in court records and public documents.

Why is this important

Court administrators manage daily court operations and handle sensitive case information, making them potential targets for harassment or violence, similar to judges. Extending privacy protections recognizes the safety risks these officials face while performing their duties. However, it also affects public access to information about government employees and could limit transparency about who manages court systems.

Potential points of contention

  • Public accountability vs. privacy: Restricting personal information about court administrators may reduce transparency about government employees' identities and backgrounds, raising questions about appropriate public oversight of judicial administration.
  • Definition scope: The bill's definition of "personal information" and what constitutes a legitimate disclosure exception (media reporting, public business records) could significantly affect practical implementation and press freedom.
  • Precedent expansion: Broadening Daniel's Law beyond judges to administrative staff may create pressure to extend similar protections to other government employees, potentially fragmenting public records access across agencies.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.