WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 3007

Evaluation and permitting of projects requiring large water appropriations provided.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Patty Acomb and 4 co-sponsors

HF 3007 creates a formal evaluation and permitting process for projects with large water withdrawals, ensuring environmental review, public input, and oversight before authorizatio

Author added Rehrauer
#naturalresourcesdepartment #water #waterresources #andwaterways
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 3007

Summary of HF 3007 (Minnesota, 2025-2026)

Purpose and intent

HF 3007 aims to establish a structured process for evaluating and permitting projects that require large water appropriations. The bill is designed to ensure that significant water withdrawals receive thorough review and approval, balancing water resource sustainability with project needs. It is introduced in the Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy committee, indicating a focus on environmental impact, water resource management, and fiscal considerations.

Key provisions and changes (highlights)

  • Evaluation framework for large water appropriations: The bill creates or formalizes a process to assess proposed projects that involve substantial water withdrawals, ensuring comprehensive scrutiny before authorization.
  • Permitting requirements: Projects that meet the “large water appropriation” threshold would be subject to a permitting regime. This likely includes determinations related to impacts on ecosystems, competing uses, and long-term water availability.
  • Decision criteria: The evaluation and permitting process would specify criteria to guide approvals, including environmental impact, sustainability of supply, potential economic or public benefits, and criteria for monitoring and compliance.
  • Administrative oversight: The bill delineates responsibilities for agencies involved in evaluating and issuing permits, potentially including timelines, reporting requirements, and interagency coordination.
  • Transparency and public engagement: Provisions may include public notice, comment periods, and opportunities for stakeholder input as part of the evaluation and permitting process.
  • Potential funding or fiscal notes: As a measure moving through the Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy committee, there could be fiscal implications or budgetary provisions to support administration, staffing, and monitoring related to the new process.

Note: The exact thresholds (e.g., volumetric limits defining “large” water appropriations), specific agencies involved, and detailed criteria are not provided in the summary information available. The bill’s full text would specify precise definitions, timelines, and procedural steps.

Who and what would be affected

  • Projects with large water withdrawals: Any proposed development or project that requires substantial freshwater appropriation would fall under the new evaluation and permitting framework.
  • Regulatory agencies: State agencies responsible for water resources, environmental protection, and permitting would implement the new process, including adherence to timelines, review standards, and compliance monitoring.
  • Public and stakeholders: The process would include opportunities for public participation and input from affected communities, industries, environmental groups, and other stakeholders.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction and referral: The bill was introduced and referred to the Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy committee (as of early April 2025).
  • Sponsor and co-sponsors: Primary author Rehrauer with co-sponsors Pursell, Smith, Acomb, and Fischer, indicating bipartisan or cross-party support typical of Minnesota environmental and natural resources legislation.
  • Future steps: If advanced, the bill would likely proceed through committee hearings, potential amendments, and then full chamber consideration, followed by potential reconciliation with the Senate (or next legislative steps) and a signature/valorem process for becoming law.

If you’d like, I can pull the bill’s full text to extract exact thresholds (e.g., gallons per day or acre-feet per year), specific agencies involved, and detailed timelines such as permit review deadlines and reporting requirements.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.