WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 128

establishing a committee to study unemployment insurance.

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Michael Granger

HB 128 would establish a formal committee to study and recommend changes to New Hampshire's unemployment insurance system.

Inexpedient to Legislate: MA VV 01/07/2026 HJ 1 P. 75
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 128

Summary of HB 128 (Session 2026, New Hampshire)

Title

Establishing a committee to study unemployment insurance

Purpose and intent

HB 128 would create a formal, standing process for examining New Hampshire’s unemployment insurance (UI) system. The primary aim is to study, review, and provide recommendations related to the administration, financing, benefits, and overall effectiveness of unemployment insurance in the state. The bill envisions an ongoing, organized review mechanism to inform potential improvements to UI policies and operations.

Key provisions and changes

  • Establishment of a study committee: The bill creates a committee specifically charged with studying unemployment insurance. Details typically include the scope of the study, membership composition, and duties, though exact language is not provided in the summary.
  • Areas of review (implied scope): While not enumerated here, typical study topics for such committees include:
    • UI benefit adequacy and eligibility rules
    • Employer and employee contributions and the solvency of the UI trust fund
    • Administration and efficiency of claims processing
    • Interaction with federal UI programs and compliance
    • Impacts of UI policy on the state’s labor market and economy
    • Recommendations for statutory or regulatory changes
  • Reporting and recommendations: The committee would likely be required to report findings and propose legislative or administrative actions based on its study. This can include proposed updates to statutes, administrative rules, or funding mechanisms.
  • Timeline and duties: The act would define the committee’s tenure, meeting cadence, and reporting deadlines. It may also specify how the study interfaces with existing state agencies (e.g., Department of Employment Security or Labor/Industrial Rehabilitative Services) and the Legislature.

Who would be affected

  • Unemployment Insurance program participants: Job seekers and UI claimants could be affected by any recommended changes to benefit levels, eligibility, or processing that may arise from the study’s findings.
  • Employers: Businesses funding UI payroll taxes could be impacted by recommended changes to contribution rates, funding solvency, or administration efficiency.
  • State agencies: Agencies involved in UI administration and oversight (likely the Department of Employment Security and related legislative committees) would implement or respond to the study’s recommendations.
  • Legislature: Lawmakers would receive a formal report with options for potential legislation or budget actions.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduced and referred: The bill was introduced in January 2025 and referred to the Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services committee.
  • Committee process: The bill underwent public hearings, work sessions, and executive sessions typical of a legislative study bill.
  • Recent action history:
    • January 7, 2026: Senate/House action labeled “Inexpedient to Legislate” (a formal committee recommendation indicating the bill would not proceed as proposed). This indicates the bill was voted down or deemed not suitable for passage in its current form by the joint committee or the chamber.
    • October–November 2025: The committee reported the bill as “Inexpedient to Legislate” with a vote of 18-0 (a unanimous unfavorable recommendation within the committee). The report was issued in HC 51, P. 14.
    • Prior sessions included retained in committee and various public hearings/work sessions in 2025 and early 2026.
  • Outcome: As of the latest action, the bill was deemed inexpedient to legislate, meaning it did not move forward toward enactment in its current form. This typically ends consideration unless amended and reintroduced.

Potential impact if enacted (hypothetical)

If the bill or a revised version were enacted, it could:
- Lead to a formal, structured review of the UI system with concrete recommendations.
- Potentially prompt legislative changes to UI financing, eligibility, or processing based on study findings.
- Improve oversight of UI program performance and alignment with workforce development goals.

Notes

  • The bill’s status indicates a legislative conclusion that, in its current form, it is not advisable to pass. It may be reintroduced with modifications in a future session.
  • For readers tracking UI policy developments, monitoring any successor bills or the committee’s ongoing work on unemployment insurance will be informative.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.