WeVote
Log In

Bill

WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 3192

Overview

HB 3192 (2026) from the Missouri General Assembly establishes the Missouri Automatic License Plate Reader Regulation Act. The bill introduces regulatory oversight for the use of automatic license plate reader (ALPR) systems by public authorities within Missouri, with a focus on limiting misuse, protecting privacy, and ensuring transparency around data collection, storage, retention, and usage.

Purpose and intent

  • Create a formal framework to govern the deployment and operation of ALPR technology by state and local agencies.
  • Protect privacy and civil liberties by setting clear rules for data collection, retention, access, sharing, and minimization.
  • Improve accountability and public transparency surrounding ALPR programs through reporting and oversight mechanisms.

Key provisions and changes

  • Definitions:

    • ALPR systems are defined as devices that automatically capture images of vehicle license plates and may extract vehicle information and identifiers.
    • Terms related to data, retention periods, access, and third-party sharing are clarified.

  • Applicability and scope:

    • Applies to state and local government agencies that deploy ALPR technology, with limited or specified exceptions (e.g., certain safety or law enforcement exceptions).

  • Data collection and retention:

    • Sets standards for the types of data that may be collected and stored, and establishes maximum retention periods.
    • Requires data minimization where feasible and prohibits storing non-license plate data beyond defined limits unless explicitly authorized.

  • Access, use, and sharing:

    • Outlines who may access ALPR data (e.g., authorized law enforcement personnel) and under what circumstances.
    • Restricts sharing of data with third parties, including private entities, with specified exceptions (e.g., court orders, ongoing investigations).
    • Prohibits routine or automated cross-jurisdictional sharing without compliance safeguards.

  • Privacy and civil liberties safeguards:

    • Imposes notification requirements when ALPR systems are deployed in public areas with persistent surveillance implications.
    • Requires impact assessments or privacy reviews for new ALPR deployments or significant changes to existing programs.
    • Establishes prohibition on certain uses (e.g., real-time tracking of individuals without a lawful purpose).

  • Oversight and accountability:

    • Creates or designates an oversight body or empowers an existing one to review ALPR programs, conduct audits, and enforce compliance.
    • Mandates annual or periodic reporting on ALPR deployments, data retention practices, and incidents or abuses.

  • Transparency and public reporting:

    • Requires public-facing information on where ALPRs are deployed, the purposes, retention periods, and contact for concerns or complaints.

  • Compliance and enforcement:

    • Establishes penalties for noncompliance with the Act by agencies or individuals responsible for ALPR data handling.
    • Sets timelines for implementing required safeguards and remediation after findings of noncompliance.

  • Effective date and phase-in:

    • Specifies when the Act or its provisions take effect and any phased implementation schedule for agencies to come into compliance.

Who is affected

  • State and local law enforcement agencies using or planning to use ALPR systems.
  • Government departments or agencies that manage or oversee public safety technology deployments.
  • Personnel authorized to access ALPR data (e.g., trained officers, analysts) and any contractors involved in data processing.
  • The general public, through enhanced privacy protections, greater transparency, and visibility into ALPR activities.

Procedural and timeline notes

  • Status: Introduced and read First Time on 2026-02-04; Read Second Time on 2026-02-05; Referred to Emerging Issues(H) on 2026-05-15.
  • Next steps typically include committee review, potential amendments, and floor consideration, followed by eventual votes in House and Senate (subject to the legislative calendar).
  • If enacted, agencies would face compliance deadlines tied to the bill’s effective date, with possible phased implementation.

Potential impact

  • Enhanced privacy protections for Missourians through data minimization, restricted sharing, and clearer oversight.
  • Increased accountability for ALPR programs via audits, reports, and public transparency.
  • Potentially higher administrative burden on agencies to establish retention schedules, access controls, and privacy assessments.
  • Clearer legal framework may influence decisions on deploying, expanding, or terminating ALPR deployments in the state.

Note: This summary is based on the bill’s title and typical ALPR regulating provisions. For precise language, sections, definitions, and any amendments, refer to the official bill text and amendments as filed by the sponsors.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.