WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 2109

Establishes the distributed generation for community solar siting commission

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Jeremy Cooney

Close travel loophole by banning excluded travel paid by lobbying clients and creating a public, searchable travel-disclosure database for elected officials.

REFERRED TO FINANCE
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 2109

Summary — S.2109 (2025): “An Act to close travel loophole in the state conflict of interest law, and to provide for greater transparency and accountability regarding travel gifts”

Status: Referred to Finance (most recent procedural entry)
Introduced: 2025-06-18 (recorded)
Primary subject (from bill text): Amendments to state conflict-of-interest law and travel-disclosure requirements (Massachusetts)

Note on metadata: Several pieces of the supplied metadata conflict (alternate bill title about solar siting; differing sponsors/petitioners and filing dates). This summary is based on the bill text provided, which addresses travel payments, disclosures, and lobbying registration.

Purpose / Intent

The bill seeks to close a perceived “travel loophole” in Massachusetts conflict-of-interest law by preventing certain travel expenses paid by lobby-connected organizations from being treated as excluded from the gift/conflict rules, and by increasing public access to and the detail of travel disclosure filings by elected officials.

Key provisions

  1. Amend M.G.L. c. 268A, §3(f):

    • Inserts a prohibition stating that no exclusion shall be established for travel expenses paid or reimbursed by an organization that, for the year the travel begins, is registered with the Secretary of the Commonwealth as a “Client” under the Massachusetts Lobbying Law (M.G.L. c. 3, §§39 and 41).
    • Effect: travel paid by organizations that are registered lobbying clients cannot be carved out as an excluded category under §3(f).

  2. Public, searchable database of travel disclosures:

    • Requires the State Ethics Commission to maintain a remotely accessible electronic database of all travel expense disclosure forms filed by elected public officials (as required under the Commission’s regulations at 930 CMR 5.00).
    • The database must be available to any member of the public upon request and searchable by the name of the filing elected official.

  3. Additional disclosure information on travel forms:

    • Directs the State Ethics Commission to revise the travel expense disclosure form to require that an official disclose whether the organization paying the travel has lobbied that official within the 12 months prior to the travel’s commencement with respect to legislation filed with the General Court.
    • The bill references statutory definitions of “legislative lobbying” and “legislation” from M.G.L. c. 3, §39.

Who is affected

  • Elected public officials in Massachusetts (additional reporting obligations; limitations on accepting certain travel).
  • Organizations that pay for officials’ travel — especially those registered as lobbying clients — which would be barred from relying on the §3(f) “exclusion” and must be disclosed in more detail.
  • The State Ethics Commission (new database, form revisions, and administrative responsibilities).
  • The public and journalists (increased access to travel disclosure data).

Procedural / timeline notes

  • Recorded actions include introduction and referral (6/18/2025), referrals among committees (Armed Services; State Administration & Regulatory Oversight), scheduling of hearings (Nov. 5, 2025), and a favorable committee report on 11/24/2025 referring the bill to Senate Ways & Means. The most recent status entry indicates referral to Finance. (Some entries/dates in the provided file appear inconsistent; see note above.)

Potential impacts and implementation issues

  • Increases transparency of travel paid for officials and makes it harder for lobby-connected entities to shield travel from conflict-of-interest scrutiny.
  • Administrative burden on the State Ethics Commission to create/maintain the searchable database and revise forms.
  • The bill modifies disclosure and exclusion treatment but does not itself specify penalties or enforcement beyond existing ethics statutes; enforcement would rely on existing State Ethics Commission authorities and procedures.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.