WeVote

Bill

Bill

S 112

Establishes the crime of doxing a police officer, peace officer, or state officer

2025 Regular Session Introduced by George Borrello and 13 co-sponsors

Creates a statewide Massachusetts Children’s Alliance to standardize, fund, accredit, and oversee multidisciplinary Children’s Advocacy Centers for coordinated, trauma‑informed car

REFERRED TO CODES
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 112

Summary — S.112 (2025): "An Act relative to Children’s Advocacy Centers"

Note on document inconsistencies
- Metadata for this docket includes an unrelated short title (“Establishes the crime of doxing a police officer…”) and a long list of sponsors that appear inconsistent with a Massachusetts state bill. This summary follows the actual bill text filed as S.112 (Sen. Julian Cyr), which creates a statutory framework for a Massachusetts Children’s Alliance and defines standards for Children’s Advocacy Centers.

Purpose and intent
- Establish a statewide Massachusetts Children’s Alliance and a new statutory chapter (Chapter 220A) to promote, fund, accredit, and support Children’s Advocacy Centers (CACs) across the Commonwealth. The goal is a coordinated, trauma‑informed, multidisciplinary response to child maltreatment (sexual abuse, severe physical abuse, exploitation) and to improve service delivery, data collection, training, and standards.

Key definitions and standards (selected)
- Defines terms including “Accreditation,” “Alliance,” “Children’s Advocacy Center,” “Forensic interview,” “Multidisciplinary team,” and “National Children’s Alliance.”
- Sets baseline operational standards for CACs (to meet or exceed National Children’s Alliance standards), including:
1. Multidisciplinary teams (law enforcement, prosecutors, child protective services, medical/mental health, victim advocacy);
2. Cultural competence and accessibility for diverse populations;
3. Neutral, developmentally‑appropriate forensic interviews (electronically recorded; team observation when practical);
4. Victim support and advocacy, with counseling/legal/medical referrals;
5. Access to medical and mental health evaluations/services;
6. Formal case review, tracking/monitoring, outcomes measurement;
7. Organizational capacity and child‑focused physical settings;
8. Additional necessary standards as determined.

Creation and powers of the Alliance
- Establishes the Massachusetts Children’s Alliance as a body corporate to provide leadership, training, technical assistance, accreditation oversight, data collection, and capacity building.
- Alliance may contract with state/federal entities and receive/disburse funds, grants, and services; it may ensure through contractual relationships that CACs meet accreditation standards.

Operational expectations for CACs
- CACs must provide a prompt, coordinated, child‑focused forensic interview and assessment, reduce duplicate interviews, facilitate information sharing among agencies, and provide comprehensive medical and mental health services and advocacy while minimizing re‑traumatization.
- CACs may be nonprofit, hospital‑based, within district attorney offices, or other governmental entities.

Who is affected
- Child victims of maltreatment and their non‑offending family members; CAC staff; law enforcement; district attorneys; Department of Children and Families; hospitals and medical/mental‑health providers; community nonprofits; and entities providing funding or oversight.

Procedural status and timeline (as reported)
- Filed: 01/08/2025 (Senate Docket No. 140)
- Introduced in Senate / read twice and referred to Judiciary: 01/16/2025
- Also listed as referred to Codes committee (01/08/2025 entries)
- Referred to Committee on Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities: 02/27/2025
- House concurrence listed 02/27/2025 (metadata)
- Hearing scheduled: 10/21/2025, 1:00–5:00 PM (B‑1)

Potential impact
- Standardizes and strengthens CAC operations across Massachusetts, likely improving multidisciplinary coordination, evidence collection, victim services, and data/quality monitoring.
- May centralize accreditation and funding pathways via the Alliance, potentially tying resources to compliance with standards.
- Could require agencies and CACs to adopt new protocols, reporting, and training to meet statutory requirements.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.