WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 178

Establishes a school air conditioning system grant program; makes an appropriation therefor

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Roxanne Persaud and 1 co-sponsor

Massachusetts agencies must direct substantial capital to microbusinesses, small businesses, and disadvantaged firms, meeting set targets (25% micro, 50% small, 67% disadvantaged).

REFERRED TO FINANCE
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 178

Summary — S.178 (2025): Directing Equitable Capital Assistance to Microbusinesses and Small Businesses

Note on source inconsistencies
- The bill metadata (title) references a school air‑conditioning grant and an appropriation, but the actual bill text filed as S.178 concerns directing capital assistance to microbusinesses and small businesses. This summary covers the text of the bill as filed (microbusiness/small business capital direction). The legislative actions and sponsor lists also contain entries that appear inconsistent with a Massachusetts General Court bill — these likely reflect data errors or conflation with other measures.

Purpose and intent
- The bill directs the Commonwealth’s economic development agencies to prioritize and allocate a specified share of grants, loans, and other financial assistance to microbusinesses, small businesses, and socially or economically disadvantaged businesses that historically face obstacles accessing capital. The aim is to make capital flows more equitable and to target smaller and disadvantaged enterprises.

Key provisions
- Amends section 49 of chapter 23G:
- Agencies “shall seek to direct”:
- At least 25% of total financing across all programs (and at least 50% of financing from the agency’s Growth Capital Division programs) to microbusinesses.
- At least 50% of total financing across all programs (and all financing from the Growth Capital Division) to small businesses.
- At least 67% of total financing across all programs to socially or economically disadvantaged businesses (examples listed: minority‑, women‑, worker‑, veteran‑, or immigrant‑owned businesses).
- Note: the section contains drafting inconsistencies (repeated subsection labels and mixed aspirational wording).

  • Adds Section 70 to chapter 23A (Executive Office of Economic Development):
    • Requires the executive office, “whenever possible,” to establish policies and procedures prioritizing socially/economically disadvantaged micro and small businesses in awarding grants, loans, and other assistance.
    • Sets specific numeric targets to be achieved agency‑wide:
    • Not less than 25% of all grants/loans/financial assistance to microbusinesses.
    • Not less than 50% of all grants/loans/financial assistance to small businesses.
    • Not less than 67% of all grants/loans/financial assistance to socially or economically disadvantaged businesses (examples again provided).
    • Language in Section 2 (chapter 23A) uses stronger phrasing (“shall be awarded”) compared with Section 1’s “shall seek to direct.”

Who would be affected
- Primary beneficiaries: microbusinesses and small businesses in Massachusetts, particularly those owned by historically disadvantaged groups (minority, women, veteran, worker, immigrant, etc.).
- Administrative bodies: Executive Office of Economic Development and agencies governed by chapters 23A and 23G (including any Growth Capital Division) that distribute state grants, loans, and other financial assistance.
- Other potential effects: recipients of current programs that are not micro/small/disadvantaged may receive relatively less financing; program design, eligibility, monitoring, and reporting requirements may change.

Implementation, legal and practical issues
- Definitions: The bill does not define “microbusiness,” “small business,” or the exact criteria for “socially or economically disadvantaged,” which will be necessary for implementation.
- Consistency & enforceability: Section 1’s “shall seek to direct” is advisory; Section 2’s “shall be awarded” is mandatory in tone. These differences could complicate enforcement and compliance.
- Overlap of targets: The 25%, 50%, and 67% goals overlap logically (e.g., disadvantaged small businesses could count toward multiple targets) but the bill does not clarify how overlaps are to be treated or measured.
- Fiscal impact: No appropriation or specific funding amounts appear in the text provided. The bill directs allocation priorities rather than creating new funds.

Procedural status (as provided)
- Introduced in the Senate: 2025-01-22; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- Other docket activity (hearings scheduled/rescheduled in June 2025) and prior referrals to the committee on Community Development and Small Businesses are noted in the record, but some items appear duplicated or inconsistent.

Bottom line
- S.178 would require Massachusetts economic development agencies to prioritize a substantial and specific share of state‑distributed capital to microbusinesses, small businesses, and disadvantaged businesses. The mechanism, definitions, and enforceability need clarification, and the bill (as provided) contains drafting inconsistencies and lacks appropriation details.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.