WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 1660

Establishes a right to repair for certain products

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Brian Seitz

Establishes a statutory right to repair by requiring access to repair information, tools, parts, and diagnostics for eligible consumer products.

Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
#businessandcommerce #motorvehicles #transportation #departmentof
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 1660

Summary of HB 1660 (Missouri, 2026) – Establishes a right to repair for certain products

Purpose and intent

  • HB 1660 aims to establish a legal right to repair for certain consumer products. The bill is designed to empower individuals and independent repair providers to repair eligible devices and equipment, with the overarching goal of increasing repair options, reducing waste, and potentially lowering total ownership costs for consumers.
  • The bill adds Missouri-specific standards and requirements that manufacturers, distributors, and sellers must follow to support repairability.

Key provisions and changes

  • Right to repair framework: The bill creates a statutory right for consumers and independent repair technicians to access necessary information, tools, parts, and compatible components needed to repair eligible products.
  • Access to repair information and tools: Manufacturers and authorized dealers would be required to provide technical documentation, service manuals, diagnostic software, and repair guidance to non-dealer repair providers or potentially to consumers, subject to stated constraints.
  • Availability of spare parts: The measure obligates entities in the supply chain to supply reasonably priced, readily available spare parts for a defined list of eligible products. It may specify timelines or conditions under which parts must be sold to third-party repairers.
  • Diagnostics and software: The bill addresses the availability of diagnostic software, firmware updates, and software that support repairability, including restrictions on locking devices or requiring unnecessary proprietary software to perform repairs.
  • Non-discrimination and warranty considerations: There could be provisions limiting discriminatory practices by manufacturers against independent repair services and clarifying warranty implications for repairs performed by third parties (e.g., guaranteeing no voiding of warranty solely due to use of non-authorized repair services, subject to safety and performance requirements).
  • Product scope and eligibility: The act designates a class of consumer products to which the right applies. This may include electronics (e.g., smartphones, laptops, appliances) and potentially other durable goods. The bill may outline criteria to determine which products are covered and whether exemptions apply (e.g., safety-critical equipment).
  • Standards and compliance: The bill could establish standards for repair information disclosure, part compatibility labeling, and consumer notice requirements. It may authorize enforcement mechanisms and penalties for noncompliance.
  • Enforcement and penalties: Provisions for enforcement, including possible penalties, administrative actions, or civil remedies for violations by manufacturers or service providers, are typically included. The bill may designate an enforcement agency or designate a process for complaints and investigations.

Who would be affected

  • Manufacturers and sellers: Entities that design, produce, distribute, or sell eligible products would face new obligations to share repair information, provide parts, and maintain compatibility with third-party repair services.
  • Independent repair providers and repair technicians: These actors stand to gain enhanced access to information, diagnostics, parts, and tools necessary to repair covered products.
  • Consumers: End-users would benefit from expanded repair options, potentially lower repair costs, longer product lifespans, and greater autonomy over device maintenance.
  • Warranty landscape: If applicable, warranty terms may be clarified or modified to ensure that using third-party repair services does not automatically void warranties, subject to safety considerations.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction and referrals: The bill originated with a prefiled status in December 2025, was introduced in January 2026, and referred to the Emerging Issues committee (H) on May 15, 2026.
  • Legal process stages: After referral, the bill would be scheduled for committee hearings, potential amendments, and votes within the House, followed by consideration in the Senate (not shown in the provided history).
  • Effective date: The bill’s text would specify an effective date upon enactment, which could be immediate upon publication or after a defined period (e.g., 6–12 months post-enactment) to allow industry transition.
  • Implementation milestones: If enacted, regulatory agencies or the legislature may issue implementing guidelines or rulemaking to define product categories, part availability standards, and disclosure requirements.

Notes

  • The summary above reflects the stated aim to establish a right to repair and to detail plausible provisions commonly found in such legislation. The exact language of HB 1660 would specify the precise scope, definitions (e.g., what qualifies as a repair, which products are covered, what constitutes “readily available” parts), and any exemptions or safety-related caveats.
  • Co-sponsor: Brian Seitz. The involvement of sponsors may influence amendments and final content during committee and floor action.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.