WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 366

Employment status of election judges clarification

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Cal Bahr and 1 co-sponsor

SF 366 clarifies Minnesota election judges' employment status, affecting their benefits, protections, and counties' election administration costs.

Referred to Elections
#elections #government-employees
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 366

Legislative bill overview

SF 366 clarifies the employment status of election judges in Minnesota, specifying whether they should be classified as public employees or independent contractors. The bill was introduced on January 21, 2025, and has been referred to the Elections Committee for review.

Why is this important

Election judges are essential workers who conduct voting operations, and their employment classification affects their eligibility for benefits, wage protections, overtime rules, and liability coverage. This clarification could impact thousands of poll workers across Minnesota and influence how counties budget for and manage election administration.

Potential points of contention

  • Whether reclassification would increase county election costs due to new benefit obligations or payroll requirements
  • Whether independent contractor status (if that's the direction) adequately protects election judges from liability and provides fair compensation
  • Whether the change affects the availability and recruitment of election judges, as employment status can influence who is willing to take these positions

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.